Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The GOP's Shutdown Tab: One Billion Dollars and Counting

By       Message Richard Eskow       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 77715
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)
- Advertisement -
Source: Campaign For America's Future


Forty million dollars an hour. A third of a billion every day. $1.6 billion every week. That's a conservative estimate of the money Republicans are wasting by keeping the federal government closed down. And if pundits like Sean Hannity have their way, they'll run up a much larger tab before this is all over.

But then, if there's one thing Republicans know how to do, it's run a tab.

The bill has already come to roughly $1 billion as of today (Thursday), and it grows larger every moment the government stays shut down. Republicans in Congress recently voted to cut $4 billion per year from programs that feed the needy. In two-and-a-half weeks they'll have wasted more than that on their shutdown.

- Advertisement -

Why? "We're not going to be disrespected," said one Republican House member. "We have to get something out of this. And I don't know what that even is."

If you think that's worth billions of dollars and the paralysis of the federal government, the GOP's the party for you.

This stunt isn't just costly and wasteful. It's endangering a fragile economy, and the jobs that go with it.

- Advertisement -

And what are we getting for their billion-dollar boondoggle? Nothing. Literally: We get nothing. The GOP's federal shutdown is on the verge of becoming the most fiscally irresponsible gesture in modern political history.

Running a Tab

That $1.6 billion per week figure first received widespread publicity when Morgan Stanley's analytical team began discussing the potential cost of the shutdown, expressed in "basis points" (see notes below), in an investor newsletter this week. (A Morgan Stanley team member confirmed the number with us on Wednesday.) Other groups, including IHS Global Insight, have since offered similar estimates.

While there could very likely be additional costs to the economy, economist Dean Baker said it was difficult to estimate them in advance. "That's where it gets speculative," Baker told us earlier Wednesday, "because there are many possible scenarios -- if, for example, a single [Food and Drug Administration] inspector misses an outbreak because he or she wasn't on the job."

As Think Progress and others have noted, the human costs of the shutdown will be felt immediately. The Small Business Administration has stopped issuing loans, directly hurting the kinds of businesses that create jobs. The National Institutes of Health has stopped accepting patients for experimental treatment (including terminally ill children), while other health cuts are affecting hospital care and physicians in medical school. Disaster relief in Colorado has come to a halt.

Fox News' editors and television personalities have taking to describing the shutdown as a "slimdown." Their amusement won't be shared by the mothers of hungry children in Arkansas, where 85,000 meals for lower-income kids will not be served as a result of the GOP's actions.

- Advertisement -

The Big Picture

The shutdown also incurs broader and less easily quantified costs that ripple throughout the economy.

Economist Stephen Fuller, who runs George Mason University's Center for Regional Analysis, estimated this weekend that the Washington, D.C. metropolitan economy could lose as much as $200 million for each day the government remains closed. Since only 15 percent of Federal workers live in the D.C. area, the true cost of the shutdown nationwide (including parts of the country with lower living costs) could conceivably be $1 billion per day or more.

Even those mothers and children receiving assistance -- a frequent target for the un-Christian Right -- contribute to the economy. Mothers without food assistance will buy less food. The same is true of suspended food programs. The party that gives billions in agricultural subsidies to corporate farms is willing to cut into those farms' profits just to deny food to kids.

Sean Hannity: Hey, Big Spender

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Richard Eskow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now