Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/8/15

The GOP Debate: It's What Oligarchy Looks Like

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message Richard Eskow
Become a Fan
  (15 fans)

Reprinted from Smirking Chimp

The Koch Brothers
The Koch Brothers
(Image by DonkeyHotey)
  Details   DMCA

In the run-up to the first Republican presidential debate, a flurry of news stories about the candidates offered glimpses of oligarchy in action. Consider:

  • Jeb Bush's largest Super PAC has already raised $103 million, most of it collected before he even officially declared that he was running for president. (That may explain the exclamation point in his "Jeb!" logo.)

  • At least 20 individuals wrote checks to Bush's Super PAC for $1 million or more, and an estimated 236 checks were received for $100,000 or more.

  • Roughly a third of the more than $380 million already raised for the 2016 election comes from less than 60 donations, according to the Associated Press.

  • For the first time in more than a century, most of the funding for a presidential election is being donated in amounts of six figures or more from corporations and wealthy individuals.

  • It took Ted Cruz three months to raise $10 million, according to the same AP account. He then more than doubled the size of his coffers by collecting $11 million with a single check from a hedge funder.

  • Donald Trump says he's financing his own campaign -- despite the fact that Trump-led corporations have filed for bankruptcy four times.

John Kasich's super PAC raised $11 million in a little more than two months. Out of 166 reportable contributions, 34 were for $100,000 or more. A number of donors gave $1 million or more.

Several leading Republican presidential candidates received most of their funding from a few high-dollar donors. Marco Rubio and Scott Walker each received most of their backing from just four donors. The campaigns of Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee and Rick Perry have each largely been financed by a single donor.

Some political high rollers don't understand why that might be a bad thing. Silicon Valley investor Scott Banister, who gave $1.2 million to Rand Paul's Super PAC, said, "I'd think that the fact that I'm willing to spend money in the public square rather than buying myself a toy would be considered a good thing."

Mr. Banister may be well intentioned, but many Americans would rather see him buy a toy than let American democracy become a plaything of the rich.

For his part, Jeb Bush wasn't apologizing. "I'm playing by the rules of the game, the way it's laid out," he said of his PAC fundraising. "And if people don't like it, that's just tough luck."

But it's not "luck" at all. It's the product of a deliberate effort to undermine our democratic system of government and replace it with the rule of the rich. This is something that is being done to us -- and, through the public financing of elections, it can be undone.

Recently five Republican presidential candidates paraded themselves before a group of mega-donors convened by the billionaire Koch brothers in Dana Point, California. The network run by Charles and David Koch has budgeted nearly a billion dollars ($889 million) to influence the outcome of next year's election.

It was left to Trump, of all people, to play the role of truth-teller. "I wish good luck to all of the Republican candidates that traveled to California to beg for money etc., from the Koch Brothers," Trump wrote on Twitter. "Puppets?"

Charles Koch has begun speaking of "injustices" and claiming that civil rights movements serve as his moral models. But his actions -- in the form of donations and campaign contributions -- belie those words. The Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has pushed laws that benefit both corporate America generally, and Koch Industries specifically. It has also promoted voter ID laws that make it more difficult for lower-income citizens to vote -- even as the Koch network spends hundreds of millions of dollars to influence the political process.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Supported 2   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Eskow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend