Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 45 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Sci Tech    H4'ed 5/4/10

Steven Hawking is wrong on Extraterrestrials

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   26 comments
Message Jim Arnold
Become a Fan
  (27 fans)
The renowned physicist Steven Hawking, a genius of number and equation, and drawing from his mastery of the virtual blackboard, has sounded the alarm to the people of earth:

"We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise [Americans say sic] whatever planets they can reach."

So shut down SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence)! Tone down the radio transmissions! And don't talk to strangers if they're short and green!

Hawking alludes to Columbus as an example of what space aliens might be like. But we've come a long ways from the Middle Ages, haven't we? Many of us? The Borg, the evil menace of the Star Trek TV series, may be the science-fiction stereotype (apparently modeled on the golden-age Hollywood motion picture studio) that Hawking suffered with a little too much. And no. I disagree. And I'm appalled. Who would have imagined a scientist in fear of the future, in fear of foreign scientists?

I'm not a scientist, but I'm inclined to optimism, to faith in creature-kind - at least in the kind of creatures who can advance so far as to master interplanetary travel. I will concede that much like global-warming denial, the risk factor alone argues for prudence as the better part - if I'm wrong, advertising ourselves to the universe with radio signals is a very bad idea.

But an extra-terrestrial civilization with massive ships capable of interstellar travel will be able to find us no matter what we do. They'll have it all down. And rather than relying on a strategy of sitting back and waiting for naive attempts at friendly communication from relatively advanced planets, they will be out scouting smartly for primitive and pristine planets with untapped resources. And if it's meat they're after, we flatter ourselves to think we're a desirable catch. Think about it: Two-legged creatures (only two drumsticks!) high in fat content, pre-marinated in chemical poisons, and intelligent enough to know, and raise hell, when we've been fenced in a feedlot. I'd pass if I were an extra-terrestrial. For every world like ours there must be a hundred that are teeming with herds of leaf-eaters.

So maybe there's an extra-terrestrial civilization that just plunders whatever it comes across. The question is: Is an inter-galactic Columbus a realistic possibility? What sort of society can achieve, and sustain, advanced technological development without first destroying itself with nuclear weapons, without the political virtues of greed and power-lust collapsing its entire eco-system?

Consider our own social models of potential galactic expansion before pre-judging the likely character of space visitors. China looks to be the next society to emerge supreme on our world, just based on current momentum. It's not a pleasant prospect, if the space-aliens who come to visit have followed a Chinese-like model. They'll eat anything in China, from yellow-mellow insect innards to cute little kittens; a "Red Chinese" style space invasion by huge, highly weaponized, and voracious meat-eaters would be a terrifying prospect. But how long can China keep a lid on a billion-plus people being treated like ant-workers? How far can they progress, how creative can their best repressed-and-blindered minds ever be, to develop beyond the level of catch-up by pirating others' technology, when there's no more technology to pirate? The Chinese have been building empires of warlords upon regional warlords for millennia. Each time a new dynasty is consolidated the warlord structure begins to fracture again. Historically, the Chinese could never extend their empires beyond the sea, so how could such a system reach across solar systems? It's an extremely unlikely model upon which to build a successful interstellar operation.

Would our extra-terrestrial visitors come from a U.S.-style system of corporate-and-government consolidation and domination? Forget about it. The ideology of the quarterly bottom-line, mega-merger, bonus-bonanza, lobby-horsing, peon-pinching, and divide-and-bonker is too ridiculous to keep from imploding on itself long before it could embark on interstellar exploration. Oh wait - it's already imploding.

European social welfare? If you can overcome the way that word "socialism" makes you foam and drool with rabid salivation, it begins to seem plausible: A society that puts the general welfare above all else, that respects or at least tolerates individual eccentricity, provides free education - even higher education - celebrates the arts, humanities, and vacationing, and willingly pays even its technological workforce a living wage.... It could work!

Look at our history as a species. Along with technological development there has always been cultural and philosophical development. Sometimes technology outpaces culture, but neither leaves the other far behind. Our planetary culture has tended toward an ever-greater appreciation for the intrinsic value of sentient beings - all sentient beings. More and more humans qualify as humans. More and more animals qualify as pets. More and more people are rejecting cannibalism, human sacrifice, slavery, and discrimination. More and more people are refusing to eat anything with a brain. It seems to be a development that has paralleled, more or less, our development of technology.

I believe it's a universal truth: Civilizations either develop culturally as they develop technologically or they collapse dinosaurically. So I believe extra-terrestrials are going to be nice. And I'm willing to risk it, too. When other earthlings are quaking in their homes, refusing to come out and talk, I'll stand forward, I'll put myself between the little greens and the Steven Hawkings. I'll put my hunch and my life on the line. Give me a Hawaiian lei, a book of world history (one that precedes the Texas school board's authority), and a Chinese kitten (just for test purposes). Then take me to their leader!

Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Jim Arnold Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A former visitant of UC Santa Cruz, former union boilermaker, ex-Marine, Vietnam vet, anti-war activist, dilettante in science with an earth-shaking theory on the nature of light (which no one will consider), philosopher in the tradition of Schelling, Hegel, Merleau-Ponty, Marx, and Fromm (sigh, no one listens to me on that either), author of a book on wine clubs (ahem), and cast-off programmer of ancient computer languages. I've recently had two physics articles published in an obscure but earnest Central European journal (European Scientific Journal but my main interests remain politics and philosophy.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thom Hartmann's book on the JFK Assassination

Spartan Women: History's greatest conspiracy?

Is theoretical physics dead-ending?

Immigration Policy: the Liberal/Progressive Dichotomy

Steven Hawking is wrong on Extraterrestrials

Gravitation, force and energy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend