Questions have been raised about some goings on before and during the Iowa Democratic caucuses. The Iowa Democrats should lose their position as first in the nation to influence the presidential elections. The way they handle the caucuses and the result reporting is profoundly flawed and almost designed to be influenced by insiders. Democrats should rise up and insist that Iowa lose its first position or change the way they do things. How?
1) Coin tosses have to go. They are an affront to democracy. It would be simple to take the number of people in each tie and blend them together to come up with a fair way to split delegates.
2) Make voting numbers open and transparent. How many people voted for Hillary and how many people voted for Bernie? It's that simple. Will that show that the caucuses do or do not actually represent the intentions of the voters of Iowa.
3) Keep technology out of it. One of the great things about the Iowa caucus system is it does not use computerized or electronic voting, which can easily be rigged or fixed. Microsoft created an app that ended up being a problem for newly registered voters, failing to direct them where to go. USA Today
reported that the app, used to tally votes, failed in some areas.
5) require that a newly registered young person be made a co-caucus chair. The current system gives the influence and power to old, establishment Democrats. It's built-in top down influence that should not be.
- Advertisement -
6) Currently, the Iowa Democratic Caucus process is a privately run operation with no accountability. When there's discussion of a re-count or investigation, the head of the Democratic party haughtily declares it's not happening. The Caucus should be supervised by the secretary of state like most states do.
Was there misbehavior in the 2016 Iowa Democratic caucuses? Maybe. But the system is set up to obscure and hide such behavior. That is reason to stop allowing the current system to continue.
Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect,
connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. He's given talks and workshops to Fortune
500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered
first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and
Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful
people on his Bottom Up Radio Show,
and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and
opinion sites, OpEdNews.com
more detailed bio:
Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big) to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project.
|The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.