Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Selling Hope: Wexler's Impeachment Charade

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   9 comments
Message scott creighton

Editor's Note: See David Swanson's article, In Defense of Robert Wexler, for another take on Rep. Wexler.

On December 12th of 2007, I made a mistake. This evening, for an hour I made the same mistake. I won’t make it again. I promise you that Mr. Wexler.

How long did you think you could get away with this little game of yours? Did Eric Johnson come to you one day after Kucinich put forward HR 333 to impeach Cheney, and say “hey, there’s some good numbers here from this impeachment thing. Now how can we ride on this for awhile?” Is that what he said, Robert? No wonder you pay him $120k a year + (and no wonder people say government is bloated. A Chief of staff for a congressman getting paid that kind of money while you guys up the minimum wage $2 per hour over three years.), or was it your idea to ride the courage and the coat-tails of a real representative back into office?

Today I got a phone call that professed to be a conference call on impeachment with Robert Wexler. So I listened in and took notes on what he said, like an idiot.

You see, on Dec. 12th 2007, I wrote a little article about Wexler’s strange “petition” that consisted of three sentences. Three. It was on a newly set-up website where you could “sign” the petition. But there were some strange things about it.

“His site for the petition is teamed with a contribute link where you can contribute to his upcoming re-election bid. In fact, signing the petition also signs you up to support his re-election. And you can’t see the actual petition, except for those three sentences; once you sign it takes you to a thank you page and offers you a chance to contribute.”

Right off the bat I noticed that his petition site had a “contribute” tab at the very top. Contribute to what you might ask? Contribute to his campaign fund, that’s what.

So I wrote the article based on the idea that no one should try to make money off of something that Kucinich started and millions of people desperately want to better our country; to protect the constitution; and to save the lives of countless of our soldiers and the innocent cilivilians in Iraq.

Once you signed the petition (as I did) it “…(a)ctually it takes you to the “Join” page of his campaign website where they ask you questions like whether or not you voted in 2006 and whether or not you would like to volunteer for his campaign staff.”

I rightly pointed out that at the time Wexler wasn’t even a co-sponsor of HR 333, Kucinich’s question of privilege to impeach Vice President Cheney. I just checked, and he got around to signing on as a co-sponsor on the 11th of this month. 12 days ago.

Anyway, 20 minutes after that article was published, Eric Johnson, Wexler’s Chief of Staff, put up a comment on the site. It’s all still there for everyone to see. He told me that yes, the petition was 3 sentences long, but was connected to an oped that Wexler had written and was linked to the site. The Oped piece was a call for impeachment, but it linked back to the petition site, and therefore the “contribute” tab as well.

Nearly a quarter of a million people signed that “petition” (you want to see what a petition looks like? Here’s one The Petition to Replace Pelosi as Speaker of the House (4 pages legal definitions, somewhat passionate language, and no DONATE link anywhere (in fact many people have felt so strongly about it they have asked to contribute, and I have respectfully declined their offers. Money is too hard to come by these days, and their signatures are MORE than enough.) I repeat: “No DONATE page anywhere”.

But, I have to admit, though I thought it strange that Johnson would happen across my little site so quickly, I listened to his argument, and posted his comments into the body of the article giving them full opportunity to make their case.

That was my mistake. It won’t happen again.

I have recently received several letters from Wexler about impeachment. He is not taking much of a hard-line with the House leadership though. He claims this is their obligation and their duty and that there is nothing more important than this bill. And at the bottom of every one of those letters is the same big DONATE link button.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Creighton Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Attended J.M.U. and V.C.U. in the '80s and '90's. Worked as a builder and installer of film, stage, and theme park sets and attractions. Currently works as a designer and draftsman for residential and commercial projects. Wrote "Prescription for a (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Georgia, Iran, and Pakistan; The Vulcan's Path to The Caspian Sea Basin

Beware the New Terrorist Scapegoat

Meet Gaith Pharaon

Selling Hope: Wexler's Impeachment Charade

On Line Petition to Remove Pelosi as Speaker of the House of Representatives

The Questionable Timing of the Pakistan Blast

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend