Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H4'ed 4/4/15

Picturing the Jewish Jesus: Bill O'Reilly and the National Geographic Channel Get It Right.

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   14 comments
Author 56926
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bernard Starr
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
Scene from Killing Jesus.
Scene from Killing Jesus.
(Image by National Geographic Channel)
  Details   DMCA
When I tuned in on March 29, 2015, for the National Geographic's film production Killing Jesus, adapted from Bill O'Reilly's book Killing Jesus, I was poised, pen in hand, to write about the return of Jesus the Tea Party guy. That's what O'Reilly gave us in his book Killing Jesus: Jesus kvetching about taxation and big government. In the National Geographic dramatization Jesus is still complaining about taxes (but who isn't). Here, though, he is more vigorously castigating the rich while praising and embracing the poor. The rich are clearly the villains; there is no suggestion of a trickle-down economic system that might share the wealth.

While the narrative does not add anything new, it may prove useful as a straightforward dramatization of the Gospels for bible classes and for others who wish to review and discuss the Gospel stories about Jesus. The production pretty much selectively follows the Gospels' depiction of Jesus' birth, ministry, and death, with a few embellished departures. For example, Elizabeth and Zachariah, parents of John the Baptist, join Mary, Joseph, and Jesus in their journey to Egypt, a journey they make in order to evade King Herod's order to kill all children in Bethlehem age two and younger. The couple accompanying Mary and Joseph is a cozy addition, but it didn't happen that way, according to Matthew's account of the event (Matthew 2: 13-14).

That said, in several important respects this production is unique as an authentic representation of the life of Jesus. Jesus, his family, and followers are portrayed as dedicated Jews. There is not even a hint about a new religion -- not until the postscript do we learn that after the crucifixion, Jesus' death and teachings did inspire a new religion that today has two billion followers. The production takes care to show Jesus' criticisms, as in the Gospels, as strictly directed against the Jewish leadership (the Sanhedrin) and, in particular, the ruthless power obsessed High Priest Caiaphas. Jesus deplores their superficial display of piety and charges that the leaders do not represent the true spiritual teachings of the Torah. Jesus fills in this omission in his sermons to multitudes of Jewish followers. Throughout the film, Jesus is called Rabbi.

Adding to the authenticity of the film is the absence of blond blue-eyed fair-skinned northern Europeans or Scandinavians. Jesus, his family, disciples, and followers, as well as other Jews, are conspicuously Semitic in appearance. They are dark-skinned, with dark, if not, black hair. Also, the attire of the Jewish villagers is spare--many are shown wearing plain Jewish shawls and headwear. Their dwellings, including Jesus' family abode, are crude and simple, true to the architecture for the poor and working-class in Galilee in the first century. These depictions--physical appearance, clothing, housing, Jewish artifacts --are dramatic departures from the Renaissance representations of Jesus and his fellow Jews.

Walk through the Renaissance Gallery of any museum and you will see painting after painting jarringly at odds with the images in Killing Jesus. In these artistically magnificent Renaissance paintings you will typically be greeted by a blond, blue-eyed Jesus and other similar appearing "Semites" ensconced in palatial settings with regal attire. They are identified as strictly Christian with no indication of any connection to Judaism.

Let's just focus on one element common in Renaissance paintings: Jesus and others in his entourage displaying a crucifix. Imagine the reaction if in Killing Jesus, Jesus, his disciples, and others were pictured strolling near the Temple in Jerusalem and in the villages in Judaea and Galilee with crucifix staffs -- a feared and hated symbol at the time, associated with the tens of thousands of brutal crucifixions of Jews and others. It would be shocking, anachronistic, and blatantly false. Yet these false representations appear in a trove of Renaissance paintings. They would be the only images of the Gospel figures that Europeans would view for centuries -- and that we still see today.

On his July 26, 2014, O'Reilly Factor Broadcast Bill O'Reilly slammed me for my criticism of Renaissance art for depicting Jesus as a Christian at a time when he was a dedicated Jew and Christianity did not exist. Ironically, the National Geographic production Killing Jesus, Executive Producer Bill O'Reilly, confirms my point. Jesus is shown fiercely dedicated to Judaism, as in the Gospels. It's therefore not surprising that the word "Jew" appears eighty-two times in the Gospels and the word "Christian" not at all. In fact, it's safe to say that if Jesus and his disciples were to view Renaissance images, like the ones below, they might think they were cartoons.

Baptism of Jesus by Ottavio Vannini and Holy Family with John the Baptist by Fra Bartolomeo
Baptism of Jesus by Ottavio Vannini and Holy Family with John the Baptist by Fra Bartolomeo
(Image by HuffPost)
  Details   DMCA

The Last Supper by Fra Angelico
The Last Supper by Fra Angelico
(Image by en.wikipedia.org)
  Details   DMCA

Art historians might do well to view the National Geographic production of Killing Jesus and afterwards re-examine Renaissance images. They might then finally acknowledge the falsification of biblical history in Renaissance artworks, which has contributed to the historic divide between Christians and Jews, a divide that is only now in the process of reconciliation and healing.

Kudos to Bill O'Reilly, script writer Walon Green, and the National Geographic Channel for setting the record straight by reminding us of the two sides of the Jesus story: Jesus the dedicated Jew and Jesus whose legacy is the emergence of Christianity. The film expresses Pope Francis' sentiment: "Inside every Christian is a Jew."

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Bernard Starr Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bernard Starr, PhD, is a psychologist and Professor Emeritus at CUNY, Brooklyn College. He is a past president of The Brooklyn Psychological Association and past president of The Association for Spirituality and Psychotherapy. At Brooklyn (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporations Plan for Post-Middle-Class America

Mind Control: How Donald Trump Has Transformed Americans into Pavlov's Dogs

How Congress Became a 'Cathouse' of Prostitutes Paying Off Their Pimps

The Pandemic Disease of the 21st Century Is on the Rise

Reza Aslan: Why Aren't You a Jew?

Why Have Art Historians Been Silent About the Falsification of Biblical History in Artworks?