Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Physical Damage To Pentagon Impossible Based on Witness Statements & Observations

By       Message Craig Ranke     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 15090
- Advertisement -
It was reported in 2009 that an independent investigation launched in 2006 uncovered over a dozen witnesses who independently corroborate an approach of the Pentagon attack jet that is irreconcilable with all official reports, data, and the physical damage proving the plane did not hit the building and continued on. Evidence was also revealed that there were witnesses to the plane flying away at an extremely low altitude immediately after the explosion. The information was uncovered by the organization Citizen Investigation Team and is available to view for free in their video presentation "National Security Alert" on their website

The organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth has closely analyzed this claim and has now released a technical document that demonstrates with calculations and animations how it is physically impossible for an aircraft on an approach as reported by the witnesses presented to transition to the required south side approach in order to cause the physical damage. The observed damage begins with 5 downed light poles and also includes the generator trailer, the outer damage to the facade of the building, leading all the way to the curious round hole in the C-ring of the Building. The transition from the north to the south path is impossible primarily due to the G forces required as well as required bank angles that are irreconcilable with the physical damage observed.

- Advertisement -

banking plane not hitting poles

banking plane security cam

The following image indicates the witness flight path illustrations in yellow contrasting with the required official flight path in blue.

flight path illustration composit

- Advertisement -

The interviews with this large group of independently corroborated credible witnesses, several of whom were on the gas station property and therefore in the absolute best location to judge which side of the station the plane flew, demonstrates that they could not have been mistaken regarding the fact that the plane flew on the north side.

While it's rather easy to be convinced of the veracity of the witness claims after viewing their interviews, some have been reticent to accept the astronomical implications and have entertained the notion that somehow the plane transitioned from the north to the south path in order to cause the physical damage as observed and reported. This latest document by Pilots for 9/11 Truth establishes with physics and math that the plane could not possibly have performed this maneuver. The necessary G forces and required bank angle of the plane definitively rule out the notion that a plane on this course could have remained intact before reaching the building and/or caused the physical damage as observed.

The document is available to view here:
click here

Or in pdf format here:
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)


Researchers To Present Exclusive, "Disturbing" Interviews With 9/11 Pentagon Witnesses in Toronto on Anniversary

Physical Damage To Pentagon Impossible Based on Witness Statements & Observations