Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/31/09

PANETTA COMPLEX: A Liberal Down The Rabbit Hole

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.

Following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, Washington Post publisher Katherine Graham sympathetically told her friend Allen Dulles, the CIA Director fired by President Kennedy after the disaster, that she knew he must be feeling terribly "unappreciated".

Leon Panetta, as Dulles' latest successor, must know that feeling well.

Being a secret service, Panetta's Central Intelligence Agency generally attracts public notice only when something has gone wrong and newsworthy expose or scandal ensues. When that happens, two vocal groups rush to excoriate the man in charge: Ideologues of the Left and Ideologues of the Right.

No matter that the events now making headlines were none of Panetta's doing, that they transpired under the earlier Administration of the Other Party. In trying to weather the storm, to maintain the morale and integrity of the vital government institution he heads, Panetta has received no credit, no thanks, and precious little support.

Panetta has been in politics and government for nearly fifty years. He is the compleat Washington "insider". But at CIA, he finds himself in a strange Wonderland, full of Mad Hatters, not just those who work tirelessly within the secure warren, but also those shouting angrily down the rabbit hole.

For the experienced politician who has seen everything else, what makes this job different from all other jobs in the current Administration?

Something that happened long ago, when Panetta was still among that now-extinct species of liberal Republicans: In 1968, the Democratic Party was torn apart by violent disagreement over the Vietnam War. One consequence was the complete disintegration of the Democratic foreign policy Establishment of the Truman and Kennedy Administrations - an Establishment, of idealistic realists who understood the significance of Secret Intelligence.

Of course, the Obama Administration is full of brilliant men and women, some too young to remember the Cold War, who would insist that the President has formed a new national security team for a new century, with impressive academic and political credentials.

But where is the supporting Democratic Establishment that once supplied the Kennans, Achesons, Bundys, Marshalls, Harrimans, Cliffords and countless others who helped this country survive the danger of an apocalyptic World War III? An Establishment to which Panetta, under attack from Left and Right, might turn for political back-up?

Nowhere to be found. For the first liberal Democratic CIA Director in the Agency's history, there seems to be no refuge in Wonderland.
But there could be.

On the White House website, there is a listing for an obscure institution called the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, which "consists of not more than 16 members appointed by the President from among individuals who are not employed by the Federal Government. Members are distinguished citizens selected from the national security, political, academic, and private sectors. The Board is a nonpartisan body, independent of the Intelligence Community, free from day-to-day management or operational responsibilities, and with full access to the complete range of intelligence-related information".

But there is no list of the current members of the Board because those appointed by President Bush resigned and, so far as I'm aware, President Obama has not appointed replacements.

Understandably, the President has had lots of other things on his mind and appointments to this Board are a very low priority. But I suspect there's another problem:

The White House doesn't know where to look.

Wanted: "Distinguished" liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans outside Government who are not rabid ideologues, who know something about Intelligence and national security, and who represent diverse and powerful institutions within American society, the kinds of people to whom an avowedly liberal CIA Director might turn for advice and counsel and support when the chips are down. As my teenaged daughter would say: "Yeah, right."

As an historian, I have to wonder: Would it help to look backward?

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

R.H. Smith Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Smith is an historian and public policy consultant.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Tesla - Toyota - NUMMI: The Electric Car Reborn?

Senator Dianne Feinstein's Defining Moment

State of Emergency: Why Bill Lockyer Should Be Governor of California


PANETTA COMPLEX: A Liberal Down The Rabbit Hole


To View Comments or Join the Conversation: