Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 6/22/11

Michael Collins: Questions for The Money Party -- Why Negative Job Growth for 11 Years?

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   10 comments, In Series: The Money Party
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

The Money Party is a very small group of enterprises and individuals who control almost all of the money and power in the United States.  They use their money and power to make more money and gain more power. It's not about Republicans versus Democrats.  The Money Party is an equal opportunity employer. It has no permanent friends or enemies, just permanent interests. Democrats are as welcome as Republicans to this party. It's all good when you're on the take and the take is legal. Economic Populist

Negative job growth for eleven years is the best evidence concerning our economic troubles.  There were 135 million jobs in 2000 for a workforce of 144 million.  Today, there are 139 million jobs for a workforce of 154 million.  That represents negative job growth when you factor in population growth.

Job growth in this economy hit a dead calm in 2000 and is now moving backwards.  If the issue isn't raised, how can we address the phenomena?

What is the Money Party doing about Negative Job Growth?

The solutions offered by congressional Republicans are packed with their favorite programs (House and Senate versions).  Unfortunately, their proposals don't have much to do with increasing jobs.

The first recommendation calls for the federal government to "start living within [its] means."  How does that happen?  Pass a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget and  put the budget process in a "straight jacket" through fixed spending limits.  We are told that this will "cut spending to immediately and substantially reduce deficits."  The Republicans fail to mention how many jobs will be created.

Their program makes rules on spending but, with one exception, it neglects to mention any specific programs that should be cut.  Guess which program they mentioned?  Their manifesto suggests that we must "control entitlement spending",  Social Security for example.  How convenient.  They cite the one program running a substantial surplus, the lifeline for seniors.

The Republican jobs program eliminates all those regulations they love to hate.  Generating more jobs by eliminating regulations is laughable. Since 2001, rules and regulations for business (e.g., Wall Street) have been tossed overboard at a record pace.  No new jobs were created during this period.  The collapse of 2008 and the Great Recession that followed are the main effect of eliminating regulations.

It is no surprise that Republicans want big tax breaks corporations.  Their corporate welfare proposals are the new "trickle down" economics.  Just give the giant corporations one more round of tax breaks and, as if by magic, they will start creating jobs.

They propose a 10 point reduction in the current corporate tax rate (from the current 35% to 25%.  They claim that it would produce 5.3 million jobs.  That's 053 million jobs for each point taxes are cut.  If the Republican's plan to collect the proposed 25% rate, that's actually an eight point increase over the 17% rates those corporations actually pay right now.  By their own logic, their proposal will cause 4.24 million jobs to disappear (8 point increase times.53 million jobs per point). Mission accomplished!

The Democrats job plan continues their sleepwalking through history.  Keep in mind that the Democrats controlled Congress from 2008 to 2010.  They did a lot for jobs on Wall Street but not much for the rest of us.

The Democratic stimulus plan of 2009 produced some jobs.  Nearly a third of the $800 billion proposal went to tax cuts.  The remaining $500 million offered a modest program at a time of great crisis.

Current proposals by the party offer programs that are a fraction of their 2009 stimulus package.  They are  hardly adequate.  They say closing corporate tax loopholes, moving toward a green economy, and fixing infrastructure (on the cheap) will do the trick.  Democrats are also fixated on balancing the budget.  They had legislative control for four years, with concurrent presidential control for the last two of those years.  They could not or would not create the conditions necessary for job growth.

Both parties go on ad nauseum about job training and make the compulsory references to community colleges as the key element.  Community colleges are outstanding resources.  They need more funding.  But the notion that there is a skills gap between the employees and available jobs was totally debunked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  A recent BLS revision of its new jobs data showed that all those new jobs simply don't exist.

Neither party addresses the ravages of free trade.  They talk about export growth but forget the reciprocal, friendly free trade deals plus the import of skilled professionals that end jobs here while creating them over there.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 3   Supported 3   Valuable 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend