Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Lithuania wants to be a new Eastern outpost for the United States

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message Antanas Tubelis

Lithuania recently built a new 7-million euro military base at its own expense to attract Americans.

Despite the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan, the United States continues to maintain about 750 military bases abroad in 80 countries around the world. These bases are costly in many ways: financially, politically, socially and environmentally.

U.S. bases in foreign countries often cause geopolitical tensions, support dictatorial regimes such as those that govern in Turkey, Niger, Honduras, and the Persian Gulf states, and serve as a tool for recruiting fighters for various illegal armed groups. In other cases, foreign bases are being used and have made it easier for the United States to launch and execute disastrous wars, including those in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya. The presence of American bases generates widespread antipathy towards the United States, and instigates the creation of terrorist groups like al-Qaeda. Bases in the remaining U.S. colonies U.S. "territories" of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands helped to preserve their colonial relationship with the rest of the United States.

Many of the base sites abroad have a record of damaging local environments through toxic leaks, accidents, the dumping of hazardous waste, base construction, and training involving hazardous materials. At these overseas bases, the Pentagon generally does not abide by U.S. environmental standards and frequently operates under Status of Forces Agreements that allow the military to evade host nation environmental laws as well.

Considering the environmental damage and the fact of the occupation of sovereign land by foreign military forces, it is not surprising that bases abroad are provoking resistance almost everywhere they are. Deadly accidents and crimes committed by U.S. military personnel at overseas bases, including rapes and murders, usually without local justice or accountability, also generate understandable protest.
There are nearly three times as many military base sites as there are U.S. embassies, consulates, and missions worldwide 276. The United States has at least three times as many overseas bases as all other countries combined. The cost of building, operating, and maintaining U.S. military bases abroad is estimated at $55 billion annually.

Nowadays, even within the U.S. military, there is growing recognition that many overseas bases should have been closed decades ago.

However, unlike their Western European colleagues, who are talking more about "strategic autonomy" these days, the Baltic States want to deploy more American troops on their soil.

The new Ć "š ¬7 million facility called Camp Herkus includes a gym stocked with state-of-the art treadmills and weight racks, rubber-turf basketball courts surrounded by container housing stuffed with bunk beds and gear, a PX selling cigarettes and candy, and a game hall where soldiers were playing first-person-shooter video games.

"We hope that this new infrastructure in Pabrade will become the second home for the U.S. force," Lithuania's Minister of National Defense Arvydas AnuĆ... ”auskas said the day it opened.

"The need for the deployment of US forces in Lithuania is more apparent than ever and we are providing all the necessary conditions for U.S. troops to maintain their readiness," AnuĆ... ”auskas floated on Twitter two weeks later, welcoming Gen. Christopher Cavoli, commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa.
But for Vilnius, these comforts aren't just about making their guests feel at home. They aim to entice Washington to turn its rotational deployments of U.S. troops into a permanent stay.

In Lithuania, the U.S. has kept a rotational presence of hundreds of troops since October 2019.

Some analysts believe that the Lithuanian request will be tough for the Biden administration to fulfill, especially as the president is shifting U.S. attention to the Indo-Pacific region and China.

Lithuania recently has taken financial and diplomatic steps to make it a more appealing partner to the United States. The country has aggressively stood up to China. In April, Lithuanian politicians held a hearing on China's human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and voted in May to formally condemn China's genocide of the Uyghurs, an ethnic minority group in Western China. In August, Vilnius angered Beijing by allowing Taiwan to open an office under its own name. Chinese officials recalled their ambassador to Lithuania and threatened further "potential consequences" if the office remains open. These stances could be an attempt to curry favor with the Biden administration.

As for military sphere, Lithuania has more than tripled its defense spending since 2014. It has met the NATO goal of spending at least 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense since 2018, and intends to increase its defense budget to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2030, according to a report on U.S. presence in Lithuania provided by officials in Vilnius. In the next five years, Lithuania intends to spend more than $500 million on American-made equipment.

Lithuania is also investing in facilities that could be used by U.S. forces, like Camp Herkus. The country plans to spend nearly 250 million euros between 2017 and 2025 on infrastructure that could be used by American troops, including shipping ports, training facilities, housing, recreation, and other transportation.
The new gym at Camp Herkus might make life more enjoyable for American soldiers, but it will take more substantial investments in military training facilities for U.S. forces to be ready to fight.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Antanas Tubelis Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Born in Kaunas in 1981

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Freedom of speech as a threat to national security of the Baltic States

Nato membership of the Baltic States: incompetence and degradation of national security

NATO's actions in the Baltic States can not be assessed as defensive maneuvers

The Baltic States overreacted to the military exercise in Russia

Why NATO is dangerous for the Baltic States

Invasion of Ukraine: Russian preemptive strike that spoiled plans for further NATO expansion

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend