Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/15/10

Lessons Learned

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message June Terpstra
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
I have recently been called to answer the question of with whom, when and where to align oneself as a warrior for social justice. These questions come up regularly in my teaching classes about resistance and revolution in a Justice Studies department in the USA. However, a more troubling and persistent call also comes from relationships with family members, neighbors and colleagues.

For some time now, a growing number of people, whether they call themselves right wingers, left wingers, Republicans, Democrats, liberals, conservatives, moderates, independents or libertarians, are vocalizing their anger and the need to resist the system which creates the political and material conditions of their lives. Many of these people who did not agree with resistance or revolutionary discourse in the past are articulating agreement with notions of rebellion and revolt now. But revolt and rebellion for what purpose? Self-interest? Survival? A Judaeo-Christian theocracy? A new and improved capitalist system in "populist guise? A return to white supremacist Protestant screeds of master/slave work ethic, replete with racism and sexism? To what extent are they accompanied with an extreme fear and hatred of the poor and a self-loathing in the middle and working class? All of these themes are prominent in the popular discourse of the media, entertainment, faux news and radio ranting spheres. These programmed narratives also manifest in student's reflections in the classroom, relatives' blogs and friends' Facebook, Twitter and Digg spaces.

While the predictions of and possibilities for resistance are more concrete today as more people rise-up to fight the oppressive political and economic conditions that are worsening all over the globe, many of the people who rise up do not want freedom for everyone. In fact, like their American forefathers whose white supremacist and patriarchal ideologies of freedom were born in the blood of genocides while perpetually sinking into deeper debt slavery to a handful of bankers they hunger for a narcissistic dream of white male capitalist entitlement to be consummated.

What then does the student of social justice, liberation, self-determination and freedom have to do with people who do not want a world where the political and material conditions of freedom are secured for everyone? Let us be clear. We cannot "agree to disagree". We must disagree and recognize that the fight for liberation from exploitation, resistance to injustice, and freedom to be a self-determining human being is on, on many fronts with many enemies.

History teaches that a fundamental rule of social justice is to work for a world where the political and material conditions of freedom are secured for everyone. By their nature capitalism, imperialism, fascism, totalitarianism, militarism, globalism, patriarchy and organized religions structure inequalities economically and socially deprive and divide people on the basis of class, sex, race, and creed. Under these systems there is freedom for some people: freedom for capitalists, "Americans", "Brits", Christians, Zionist Jews, select whites, upper-class men and women of acceptable creeds and colors, but definitely not freedom for all people everywhere. That was never the intent of their framers.

The lesson should not have to be learned over and over. When a resistance group or revolution does not adhere to this fundamental principle to work for a world where the political and material conditions of freedom are secured for everyone, the people will continue to suffer injustice, inequality, exploitation and oppression. Another major lesson learned is this: the structuring of freedom into a new society is no easy task and nothing can be proscribed (especially not by Euro-American Judeo-Christian imperialists and their military forces). The conditions for freedom are unique to each locale and culture and must be decided by the people concerned. This is the essence of freedom, involving self-determination and responsibility for the choices that are made and acted upon.

Many revolutions and resistance movements ultimately failed in their goals for freedom in this context and most of these movements excluded groups of people on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity and creed. The French Revolution prioritized the middle class and ultimately rejected the poor, the working classes and the women who fought for the revolution. The Russian Revolution attempted to rectify some of the wrongs against the workers, peasants and even women but still hated certain ethnic groups while re-instating a new version of imperialism and the old stratified class system. America wound up amplifying the Imperialist brutality and extending the world domination practiced by its one-time colonial master Britain, creating an entity founded on and sustained with the genocides against a large number of peoples and nations, beginning with the Red Indians and the Black slaves. Additionally, many global nationalist and independence movements, past and present, mistreat and abuse women, certain ethnic tribes and people of various religious creeds, social milieus and cultural backgrounds.

Thus, we must distinguish ethical from unethical liberatory projects. It is very clear; if they are not for the freedom of all people than we do not support the work, group, organization, reform, resistance or revolutionary project. For the record, all of these projects must recognize and include the freedom of women. Let us affirm that the goal of participation in any work, project, art, reform, resistance and revolution is to end oppression in mutual recognition of each other as free human beings with the right to self-determination.

What are the principles of revolutionary relationships? Certainly, this recognition of each other as free and equal human beings is one fundamental principle. Revolutionary relationships are mediated through our common commitment to shared goals and values of a world that is structured to foster political and material freedom. If the goals and values of a group are to rid a nation of invaders, occupiers and despots it necessarily follows that men and women must support each others' projects as equal self-determining human beings rather than determined beings based on creed, culture and gender. Women and men of all creeds and cultures are equally qualified to become guerrillas and guardians against injustice. The standards of equality, courage, strength and fortitude cannot be based on the male body, the "American" entity, the "Christian spirit" or the capitalist system.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

June Terpstra Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

June Scorza Terpstra, Ph.D. is an activist educator and university lecturer in Justice Studies, Criminal Justice and Sociology. She has founded numerous programs for homeless, abused, youth and oppressed people in the USA. She is presently teaching (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Training Killers in the Classroom

A Review of "Being In Time: The Post-Political Manifesto" by Gilad Atzmon

Views from Venezuela: The San Juan Festival in Curiepe, Venezuela

Views from Venezuela: From Left to Right

Laudable Features of the Cuban Revolution

Audacious, No Change

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend