April 2, 2009
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said the refusal of Republicans to act in a non-partisan way has hobbled his plan for a "truth commission" that would examine alleged Bush administration abuses.
In a Senate floor speech Thursday, the Vermont Democrat acknowledged that his plan could not move forward as he intended unless all sides approached the inquiry into ex-President George W Bush's expansive claims to executive power with objectivity and fair-mindedness.
Leahy insisted that he had not abandoned his commission idea, but was "not interested in a panel comprised of partisans intent on advancing partisan conclusions." I regret that Senate Republicans have approached this matter to date as partisans. That was not my intent or focus. Indeed, it will take bipartisan support in order to move this forward." On Monday, Leahy confided to a group of Vermonters that his "truth commission is not going to happen" because not a single Republican would support it, according to journalist and author Charlotte Dennett, who attended the meeting. [See Consortiumnews.com's "Leahy Bails on Truth Commission Plan."]
In the floor statement, Leahy said, "I continue to call on Republicans to recognize that this is not about partisan politics. It is about being honest with ourselves as a country. We need to move forward together." But if bipartisan support is what it will take to get a truth commission off the ground, it's likely not going to happen--and Leahy is well aware of that. Republicans are against the idea of any investigation of Bush's "war on terror" policies, whether by a truth commission or a special prosecutor.
The Leahy staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that if the truth commission does not come to fruition, that doesn't mean there wouldn't be oversight into the Bush administration's policies through "more traditional means," such as congressional hearings.
Though the Republicans surely have sought to obstruct any comprehensive inquiry into Bush's policies, many Democrats also have been lukewarm about the idea.
Aides to more than a dozen Democratic leaders in the Senate and the House, whom I have spoken to over the past week, told me lawmakers are simply not interested in an investigation into the Bush administration no matter what form it takes.
Those aides spoke on the condition that I would not disclose their names or the names of the lawmakers they work for so as not to anger the progressive base of the Democratic Party.
In his Thursday floor statement, Leahy noted that new evidence has only deepened concerns that Bush abused his presidential powers.
"In the months and years following 9/11, driven by an inflated view of executive power, the Bush-Cheney administration compromised many of the very laws and protections that are the heart of our democracy," Leahy said. "Their policies, which condoned torture, extraordinary renditions and the warrantless wiretapping of Americans, have left a stain on America's reputation in the world.
"In recent weeks, we have also seen a few more opinions previously issued by the [Justice Department's] Office of Legal Counsel after 9/11 that had been kept secret until now. ... These opinions sought to excuse policies that trample upon the Constitution and our duly enacted legal protections.
"These opinions arise from an arrogant rationale that the President can do anything he wants to do, that the President is above the law. The last President to make that claim was Richard Nixon. We saw the results of that policy in Watergate. It was through efforts like the Church Committee that we revised our laws and moved forward. In my view, it is time to do so again."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).