Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Interlocking Markets and Their Analysts

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message James Brett       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 215
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -
The truth of a world-wide recession (and in some places a depression) is told by an article like this in Friday's San Jose Mercury, the major newspaper of Silicon Valley in central California, which is monitored daily because of its centrality to the high tech sector in our own economy. When one part of the interlocked international markets suffers a hit, the rest of the world hurts. This "referred pain" is the result of an "organic" connection between national economies. The inference you should draw is that we need to know a lot more about markets and their managers. While reading this article I also found myself questioning (again) the role of "analysts," especially since I am now aware that these guys do not agree very often. Yes, they agree, for instance, that The Royal Bank of Scotland's performance over the past 90 days is not what The Royal Bank of Scotland said it would be (or hoped it would be), but beyond the numbers (which were "purposefully stated" at the beginning of the period) there is the real meaning. Who determines whether the meaning is correctly interpreted or not? This is an important question, since public attitudes toward the Royal Bank of Scotland, say, are based (as we see in this article) on the nameless analysts' pronouncements. Well, I think there is a lot to discuss along these lines, especially since the basis of analysts' integrity may differ in different cultures. This goes from tethering to honesty to outright collusion and misrepresentation. I am not satisfied that reporters report based on a "feel" for which are the truly intelligent analyses and which are not. "Feel" is much too subjective, and when cloaked in anonymity, I am left outside the loop and wondering. Inside the loop there is a mechanism that we could depend on, if we knew more about it. That is the competition among analysts and the mechanism that end-users have for discriminating among the prowess and efficacy of analysts. As far as I know this is a very murky area with financial rating organizations like Standard and Poors being themselves rated on the basis of general reputation, rather than detailed individual prognostications. Investment analysts are $1000 a dozen and completely at liberty to say any damned thing they want that will keep customers. Keeping customers is just as likely to be keeping them comfortable in false hope and spurious information as actually analyzing companies and their prospects. In other words, in the area of analyzing the analysts we are very much at the mercy of rumor, reputation, and networks of information that dodge behind closed doors when we most need them to be open, transparent, and tethered to discernible facts. It seems to me that analysts are very much behind on the employment of technological means and rigorous formulas in the practice of their craft. Dow Theory analysts, on the other hand, seem to me to be in thrall of their graphs, leaving common sense out to dry as the tectonic murmurs of industries record on the seismographs of the markets. Reading some analysts' interpretations of Dow Theory is like auguries taken from the entrails of sacrificed goats. There is a centuries old industry in stock market advice that we now call analysis. Given the globally integrated nature of economies and markets, and given the disaster that has befallen us in some measure directly attributable to feckless and dishonest and deluded analysts, the slack is out of this rope now, and we need to get scientific (in so far as that is possible) about market analysis. JB

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

James R. Brett, Ph.D. taught Russian History before (and during) a long stint as an academic administrator in faculty research administration. His academic interests are the modern period of Russian History since Peter the Great, Chinese (more...)
 

James Brett Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Economy v. Ecology

VP Debate: One Gigantic Mistake by Sarah Palin ... Huge!

Tell It Like It Is

Capitalism, Fascism, and Socialism

The Meaning of the Mike Connell Story: Under the Bus

The End of the Marshall Plan