Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   13 comments
Sci Tech

How much uranium yellowcake is in coal versus nuclear power?

By       Message John Toradze     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 20724
- Advertisement -
I happened on this article, then did the arithmetic on the implications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sparton Resources announced that it had successfully produced a small quantity of yellowcake (U3O8) from fly ash from a Chinese coal-fired power plant.

The uranium extraction test work is being conducted by Sparton's processing engineering consulting firm Lyntek Inc of Denver, Colorado, USA. The test to produce yellowcake used 6.1 kg of mixed fly ash produced at the Xiaolongtang power plant. The ash averaged some 0.4 pounds of U308 per tonne of ash (160 parts per million uranium or 0.00016).
- Advertisement -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ratio of yellowcake to enriched uranium is about 11%-12% of the yellowcake that creates nuclear fuel for power plants. World production of coal ash is somewhere between 700 million and 1.5 billion tons per year, which is a world distribution of about 160,000 tons per year of raw yellowcake uranium upon the world. (Taking 1 billion tons as the nominal value for convenience).  10^9 x 1.6x10^-4  
One source has worldwide uranium production at 36,263 tons in 2004. Which means, that if all the uranium mined each year for power plants were dispersed as fine particles around the world in the air, it would be around 22% of what is distributed from coal fired power plants. Then, of course, there is radium and other materials from coal. Coal is, unfortunately, the default option that we are taking when we ask for electricity without burning oil or gas.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

John Toradze is the pen name of a scientist who ran an office in Tbilisi, Georgia for 5 years and traveled widely in Russia the former USSR nations and nearby. I have authored chapters for books published by the West Point terrorism center on (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Trig Palin's parentage is a national security matter.

Why we need nuclear power.

Understanding the Afghanistan War: 1/3 the Troops, Larger than Iraq far worse terrain, near same population.

How much uranium yellowcake is in coal versus nuclear power?

Understanding Putin and the conflict in the Caucasus

Understanding Georgia versus Russia in the Caucasus Crisis