Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/18/14

How Did We Get Here? (And How Do We Get Out?)

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   14 comments
Author 58283
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Turcotte
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
[C]onservatism is the negation of ideology: it is a state of mind, a type of character, a way of looking at the civil social order.
The attitude we call conservatism is sustained by a body of sentiments, rather than by a system of ideological dogmata. 


Mere unthinking negative opposition to the current of events, clutching in despair at what we still retain, will not suffice in this age. A conservatism of instinct must be reinforced by a conservatism of thought and imagination.


So what happened?

How did society move from a point where those principles stood as longstanding anchors in the foundation of conservative political philosophy to so much bitterness, often-times hysterical nonsense, combined with knee-jerk opposition and willful obstruction today?

It's disheartening; it's frustrating; it's at times enraging ... but mostly it's all so pointless.

I'll admit at the outset: I'm an unabashed progressive/liberal. The perspective from which I view political discourse nowadays is framed by those strong leanings. I'm certain that my own biases and beliefs contribute to my consternation about conservative behavior and ideology.

I don't always understand the motivations of right-wing arguments. Too often, my first instinct is to ridicule what I see as so much inane, thoughtless fear-mongering and narrow-minded rancor serving no purpose. Not helpful, I admit.

The competing visions and beliefs frame all that we do--and don't do. Each choice, each decision, and each perspective leads to its own set of outcomes--not always the "best" ones, either. Our behaviors and ideologies are the primary factors creating the very problems we're trying to solve--the ones we must solve if our own ambitions (and hopes for bequeathing a peaceful and prosperous world to our children) are to be honored.

We may view ourselves as belonging to certain groups with what we perceive to be clear boundaries and conditions for inclusion. But in the end, we each share an arguably common set of ambitions: peaceful existence; some measure of prosperity; a healthy dose of happiness for ourselves and our families, guided always by the hope that there's one better opportunity--at least one better tomorrow--just around the corner.

But the realities are different. We cannot solve common problems if we can't agree first on the facts; the nature of the problems; or whether we even have problems to begin with. The truth is we do have any number of challenges ahead. Ideologies afford no protection from those realities. Mouthing the talking points without bothering to understand is a waste of time and breath.

As citizens, we owe it to ourselves, our families, our communities, and our nation, to understand not so much the nuts and bolts of policy, but what drives each political camp, and where we all wind up when decisions are made.

Who "wins"? Who does not? It's important to understand the answers to those inquiries.

Change is upon us. The partisan philosophies liberals and conservatives each defend so vigorously must now take a back seat to practical, cooperative problem-solving.

We have some unpleasant issues to accept and address--not the least among them a distressed middle class, a warming planet, and energy-supply restraints.
United States Capitol Building, The National Mall, Washington, DC
United States Capitol Building, The National Mall, Washington, DC
(Image by Jeffrey)
  Details   DMCA



The embarrassment we call Congress, and a cowardly media, deserve some thoughtful and constructive tweaking as well.

Dealing with these and other national challenges to the best of our collective abilities, regardless of the beliefs we cling to in an abstract environment where outcomes never matter, is the task at hand. Sooner would be better.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Turcotte Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Looking Left and Right: Inspiring Different Ideas, Envisioning Better Tomorrows I remain a firm believer in late U.S. Senator Paul Wellstone's observation that "We all do better when we all do better." That objective might be worth pursuing (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Peak Oil: Thinking Ahead

Peak Oil: Another Challenge

Peak Oil: A Few Basics

Left v. Right Pt 9

Indifference

Left v. Right: Different Worlds Pt 4