Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 31 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H3'ed 9/4/19

Here's How to Understand Trump and His Supporters (REVIEW ESSAY)

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 38575
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

Donald Trump Sr. at #FITN in Nashua, NH
Donald Trump Sr. at #FITN in Nashua, NH
(Image by Michael Vadon)
  Details   DMCA

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) September 4, 2019: In Olivia Fox Cabane's 2012 book The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master the Art and Science of Personal Magnetism (Portfolio/ Penguin), she says, "Until the 1980s, in fact, many highly influential leadership thinkers, such as Peter Drucker, vehemently opposed both the study and teaching of charisma. Drucker frequently pointed out that the most charismatic leaders of the last century were Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Mussolini" (page 220).

Like Drucker, Cabane in her 2012 book can be described as a leadership thinker. Like Drucker, she is addressing people in business organizations, although she occasionally mentions certain political leaders as exemplifying something she is discussing. Clearly leadership can and does occur in a great variety of contexts, not just in the context of business organizations and in the context of political organizations.

Cabane says, "presence turns out to be the real core component of charisma, the foundation upon which all else is built" (pages 5-6). In my estimate, what she means by presence is essentially what the American psychotherapist Carl Rogers (1902-1987) means by unconditional positive regard the attitude he urges psychotherapists to have toward a client in the context of psychotherapy.

The other two dimensions that Cabane sees as basic for charisma are what she refers to as (1) power and (2) warmth (toward us personally, or at least toward our kind, whatever that may be). She says, "'Fight or flight?' is the power question. 'Friend or foe?' is the warmth question" (page 5).

According to her, leaders project the three crucial aspects of charisma: presence, power, and warmth, consciously or subconsciously (page 6). But she also says that "charisma is the result of specific nonverbal behaviors" (page 4). Consequently, she devotes a great deal of attention to body language and nonverbal communication. For example, she even devotes a chapter to "Charismatic Body Language" (pages 143-164).

Cabane says, "Charisma gets people to like you, trust, and want to be led by you" (page 2). In my estimate, she seems to presuppose that you know something about the people you want to have like you, trust you, and be led by you. But she does not explicitly discuss this presupposition perhaps because she assumes that it is implied in the context of a given business organization.

Because her book is a self-help book for leaders in business organizations, Cabane devotes a chapter to the technique of visualization: "Creating Charismatic Mental States" (pages 67-97).

Now, Cabane routinely refers to accessing certain dimensions of our psyches and projecting them. However, whenever we project something that we have accessed from our own psyches, we do so in a given context. Then when other people in the given context respond to what we are projecting, they, in turn, are also projecting something from their psyches that matches what we are projecting.

For example, Trump projects whatever Trump projects, and his most ardent supporters match his projections from his psyche with similar projections from their own psyches. In this way, Trump and his most ardent supporters form a kind of mutual admiration society with one another.

Now, the late American Jungian theorist and psychotherapist Robert L. Moore (1942-2016) of the Chicago Theological Seminary worked out what he refers to as four kinds of archetypes of maturity in the human psyche:

(1) the Royal archetypes (King and Queen);

(2) the Warrior archetypes (masculine and feminine);

(3) the Magician archetypes (masculine and feminine);

(4) the Lover archetypes (masculine and feminine).

Each of us comes equipped with these four kinds of archetypes of maturity in our psyches. According to Moore, each gendered archetype of maturity has one optimal form, but two "shadow" forms. Each of the eight optimal forms is pro-social, but each of the sixteen "shadow" forms tends not to be pro-social.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Stan Crawford

Become a Fan
Author 511938

(Member since Aug 15, 2018), 1 fan, 217 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

My observations of tRumptard's is they are mostly white middle-aged people who are scared of their progeny becoming a minority in the country of their birth. Though this was projected over a century ago, these people have their heads in the sand, harking for a myth of time when the USA was like the nightly soap-comedy's of the 50-60's.


They admire their Socialist POTUS King Con Don, for he is everything they are not, money rich? (not wealthy), a bully who blames others for the country's self-created problems. By accusing illegals/refugees and Muslims for the policies this country pursues to create these hoards to come to US shores to "steal" jobs to become parasites sucking off the Social systems; too mentally-challenged to not research and see that White America receives more Social welfare than others.


They too want to lash out both verbally/physically like shyster Don does, but too scared as an individual, but as a mob are most violent and ruthless. They have not accepted the Civil Rights Legislation passed in the 60's and desire the time when public places had designated areas for them to be serviced.


tRumptard's think they are patriots in making "MAGA"...NOT! tRump and his band of Reagan War Criminals and others are still trying to create regime-change in C/S America, while bullying allies and enabling adversary's. It will take many a future administration to rectify the damage inflicted by the tRump regime, if humanity has this long?


A generation of youth will be loud, obnoxious and feeling entitled to act as their mentor Court Jester Don the Con feeds them their daily Twitter Twit rants of vile rhetoric that encourages them to lash out at his objectors. A repeat of a time not so long ago that didn't end well for humanity.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:34:52 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment