Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   8 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

Florida Gay Adoption Ban Ruled 'Not Rational'

By       Message Rady Ananda       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

News 1   Supported 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 11/29/08

Author 2795
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -
On Tuesday, nationally renowned child advocate Cindy Lederman of the 11th Judicial Circuit (Miami-Dade County) granted adoption of two children to Martin Gill, a gay man who has fostered them for four years, along with his partner.  Judge Ledermen further ruled Florida's gay adoption ban unconstitutional, calling the state's arguments "not rational."  The State has appealed the decision.   


Martin Gill told news reporters, "I wasn't here to make history.  I was here trying to do the best thing for a four-year-old and an eight-year-old that have been in my custody for four years."   

The American Civil Liberties Union assisted Gill in his petition and provides the following video:  


The ACLU reports that Martin and his partner of eight years built their lives around their three children (one natural and two adopted).  Because they both work in the travel industry, they are able to arrange their schedules so that at least one of them is always at home for the children.  


- Advertisement -

Parental presence is one concern of Judge Lederman, a fierce child advocate who gained national attention in 2003 when she launched the Miami Safe Start Initiative, with the help of Dr. Joy Osofsky, an expert in early child development.  NPR called the initiative, "some of the most innovative intervention programs for young mothers and infants in the dependency-court setting today.  Recognized by child welfare experts as 'pioneering,' the Lederman programs are court-initiated, court-administered and aimed at helping babies and toddlers as soon as they come into the dependency court system.  The centerpiece of the court's initiative consists of 25 weeks of intensive, one-on-one therapy between mothers and their babies, and also includes other parent-support services such as transportation, school and job placement, developmental screenings for all infants and toddlers and the first court-based Early Head Start program in the country." 

Judge Lederman's experience with child development experts played heavily in this case.  She noted, "There's no rational basis to preclude homosexuals from adopting," overturning the 31-year-old discriminatory law.  "I find that the law prohibiting gay adoptions violates the children's right to equal protection."  Gill provided five experts to testify on the damage Florida's gay adoption ban would cause, and to refute State testimony on alleged harm done to children by having gay parents:

* Dr. David Brodzinsky testified that being removed from this family would be "emotionally devastating" for the children and would cause them long-term damage.  

*  Dr. Michael Lamb testified that 40 years of scientific research reveal uniform findings; not a single one of these studies found an elevated rate of adjustment problems among children raised by gay parents. 

- Advertisement -

*  Dr. Lamb also testified that research on gay parent families uniformly found that the healthy development of children raised by gay parents isn't harmed by societal prejudice against their parents, and that children of gay parents are no more likely than other children to experience peer rejection or teasing.  

*  Dr. Lamb also testified that while research shows that children in two-parent families are more likely to be well-adjusted than children raised in single-parent families, it also shows that this disparity is about the number of parents, not the gender of the parents.  

*  Dr. Susan Cochran testified that  while gay people as a group suffer a somewhat higher rate of psychiatric disorders than the general population, there are other demographic characteristics such as ethnicity and income that correlate with similar or higher rates of psychiatric disorders, yet those groups aren't excluded from adopting.  

*  Dr. Anne Peplau testified that relationship breakup rates vary across demographic groups.  Other demographic characteristics that are not excluded from adopting have higher correlations with relationship break ups than sexual orientation.  

*  Dr. Peplau also testified that there is no basis for saying that gay people are more prone to domestic violence and, in fact, studies show that the highest rate of domestic violence is experienced by women in heterosexual relationships and that the rates for people in same-sex couples and men in heterosexual relationships are all lower.   

*  Dr. Frederick Berlin testified that the sexual orientation of parents doesn't determine the sexual orientation of their children.  The overwhelming majority of gay people were raised by heterosexual parents and the overwhelming majority of children raised by gay parents are heterosexual.

- Advertisement -
Taking this testimony into careful consideration, Lederman ruled:
"As a result, based on the robust nature of the evidence available in the field, this Court is satisfied that the issue is so far beyond dispute that it would be irrational to hold otherwise; the best interests of children are not preserved by prohibiting homosexual adoption.... 

"Moreover, the statutory exclusion defeats a child's right to permanency as provided by federal and state law...."

Florida was the only state to ban gay couples from adopting.  Mississippi bans single gays from adopting (but not couples), and Arkansas and Utah don't allow any unmarried couples to adopt.  Arkansas voters reportedly passed this ban on November 4th. 

Lederman granted the Petition to Adopt the day before Thanksgiving, providing the Gill family – and the nation's minority homosexual population – with more cause for giving thanks. 

For related news, see CA Supreme Court to Hear Prop 8 Challenge.


- Advertisement -

News 1   Supported 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

- Advertisement -