Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Did John Bolton Leak Intelligence to Sabotage a Trump-Kim Deal?

By       Message Gareth Porter       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/2/18

Author 57415
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

From Truthdig

From flickr.com: John Bolton {MID-289055}
John Bolton
(Image by Gage Skidmore)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

The still-unscheduled Donald Trump-Kim Jong Un summit offers the opportunity for a denuclearization deal that would avoid a possible nuclear war, but that potential deal remains vulnerable to a hostile corporate media sector and political elites in the United States. At the center of this hostility is national security adviser John Bolton, who's not just uninterested in selling a denuclearization deal to the public. He's working actively to undermine it.

Strong circumstantial evidence indicates that he leaked intelligence to a Washington think tank sympathetic to his views in order to generate media questioning about the president's announced plan to reach an agreement with North Korea's leader.

Bolton made no secret of his visceral opposition to such a deal before Trump announced that Bolton would become national security adviser, arguing that Kim Jong Un would never let go of his nuclear weapons, especially since he is so close to having a real nuclear deterrent capability vis-a-vis the United States.

- Advertisement -

Even after meeting Trump on March 6 to discuss joining the administration, Bolton was not expecting the announcement of a Trump-Kim summit. Trump tweeted about progress in talks with North Korea that day, but when asked about such talks in an interview with Fox News later that same day, Bolton dismissed the whole idea. He portrayed Kim's willingness to have discussions as aimed at diverting Washington's attention from Pyongyang nearing its goal of having a "deliverable nuclear weapon."

After the Trump-Kim summit was announced on March 9, Bolton made a tactical adjustment in his public stance toward talks with Kim to avoid an open conflict with Trump. He started suggesting in interviews that Trump had cleverly "foiled" Kim's plan for long, drawn-out talks by accepting the proposal for a summit meeting. But he also urged Trump to assume a stance that would guarantee the meeting would fail.

In an interview with Fox News on the day of the summit announcement, Bolton suggested a peremptory demand by Trump to Kim: "Tell us what ports should American ships sail in, what airports American planes can land to load your nuclear weapons." And in a second interview with Fox that day, Bolton suggested that Trump demand that Kim identify the ports and airfields to be used to "dismantle your nuclear program and put it at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, where Libya's nuclear program lives." Bolton's invocation of the Libyan example of giving up a nuclear weapons program was an ostentatious way of conveying his intention to keep open the option of using force to overthrow Kim's regime.

- Advertisement -

Bolton was staking his opposition to negotiations with Kim primarily on the argument that North Korea would simply exploit such negotiations to complete its testing of a nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). But former CIA Director Mike Pompeo got a concrete commitment from Kim to end all tests during their meetings in Pyongyang on April 7-8, which Kim then announced officially on April 20.

Pompeo's report on Kim's commitment, coming just before Bolton's first day in the White House on April 9, immediately vitiated Bolton's chief argument against a denuclearization agreement. But Bolton had another argument to fall back on. When a Fox News interviewer asked him on March 6 about a possible nuclear testing freeze, Bolton replied, "A freeze won't work. The only inspections system that you could have with any prospect of finding out what they're up to would have to be so intrusive it would threaten the stability of the regime."

As an argument that a testing halt wouldn't work, that comment was nonsensical: The United States has no intrusive inspections to detect a test of a long-range North Korean missile or of a nuclear weapon. But Bolton could use the need for an intrusive inspection system that North Korea would resist as an argument against a denuclearization agreement. He was well aware that in 2008, Vice President Dick Cheney forced Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to change the agreement she had reached with North Korea in October 2007 to require an intrusive verification system at a different stage of implementation -- before the United States had taken North Korea off the terrorism list and ended the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act rather than after that, as had been originally agreed. North Korea refused to accept the new verification demand and then denounced the agreement in late 2008.

Within a few days of Bolton taking over as national security adviser, someone leaked intelligence to a Washington think tank on a North Korean facility allegedly intended to produce nuclear-grade graphite, a key component of nuclear reactors. The leak resulted in a post by David Albright, the executive director of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), on April 20 with satellite images of what he identified as a North Korean nuclear-grade graphite plant. Albright wrote that a "knowledgeable government official" had identified the site of the factory on the Yalu River, which divides North Korea from China.

Albright suggested that the factory "violates the spirit of the upcoming summit processes with the United States and South Korea." And he concluded that any agreement with North Korea "must contain its verifiable commitments not to proliferate nuclear goods and abide by internationally recognized strategic export control regimes."

But Albright presented no evidence that the building under U.S. intelligence surveillance had any bearing on negotiations on denuclearization. His report made it clear that analysts had only suspicions rather than hard evidence that it was for nuclear-grade graphite, referring to "the suspect site" and to "the suspect facility." Albright also admitted that nuclear-grade graphite is a "dual use" material, and that an existing North Korean facility produces it for components of domestic and foreign ballistic missiles, not for nuclear plants.

- Advertisement -

Albright nevertheless implied that nuclear-grade graphite is produced and traded covertly. In fact, it is sold online by trading companies such as Alibaba like any other industrial item.

On April 21, despite the absence of any real link between the "suspect facility" and a prospective denuclearization agreement, The Washington Post published an article by intelligence reporter Joby Warrick, based on Albright's post, that suggested such a link. Warrick referred to a "suspected graphite production facility" that could allow North Korea's "weapons program" to "quietly advance while creating an additional source of badly needed export revenue."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Gareth Porter (born 18 June 1942, Independence, Kansas) is an American historian, investigative journalist and policy analyst on U.S. foreign and military policy. A strong opponent of U.S. wars in Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, he has also (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hillary Clinton and Her Hawks

How Mistress Helped Petraeus

From Military-Industrial Complex to Permanent War State

Why Washington Clings to a Failed Middle East Strategy

What Ken Burns Left Out of the Vietnam Story

Gates Conceals Real Story of "Gaming" Obama on Afghan War

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


George King

Become a Fan
Author 95129

(Member since Aug 11, 2014), 15 fans, 19 articles, 2247 comments, 1 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Thanks for the article Gareth, there is no shortage of manipulation of false flags, cover ups and acts that cross in to the area of treason and sedition and are hidden under various types of lies using National Security as a curtain to hide these crimes against humanity.

Not a day passes that some exposures break the surface and then are whisked from view by various means from what can be nothing short of a transnational criminal cabal inside and outside of our goverment. The Ministry of Truth through manipulations of The Ministry of Records encompassing our open air prison/s, world.

"Against War, Lies and Censorship."

This story had a shelf-life of eleven days. None of these issues will be probed by the media because the war drive against Russia will suffer no criticism. The Socialist Equality Party, British section of the ICFI, is organizing a series of meetings across the country, under the title "Against War, Lies and Censorship." We urge all those serious about building an international anti-war movement to attend an event near them. This article should be read from the source which depth I could not cover in a comment.

British media told to conceal connections between Skripal and MI6

Thomas Scripps, WSWS, May 2 2018

Craig Murray has published evidence suggesting that a D-notice has been issued to the press to protect MI6, hiding its connections to the Russian double-agent Sergei Skripal.

According to the Conservative government and a compliant media, Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned by Russia with a "novichok" nerve agent. A D-notice (Defense and Security Media Advisory Notice) is used by the British state to veto the publication of potentially damaging news stories.

Formally a request to withhold publication, the slavishness of the mainstream media ensures these notices function for the most part as gag orders. Murray noted the suggestion in a comment by Clive Ponting that a D-notice had likely been issued in relation to some aspect of the Skripal affair, and then Channel 4 journalist Charles Thomson's confirmation that a D-notice had indeed been issued, and that it related specifically to the identity of Skripal's MI6 handler. Murray suggests that the MI6 agent in question is called Pablo Miller, and that this attempt to protect Miller's identity is highly significant, because he is an associate of former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, first in espionage operations in Russia and more recently in the activities of Steele's private intelligence firm, Orbis Business Intelligence.

Steele was responsible for compiling the Trump--Russia dossier, comprising 17 memos written in 2016 alleging misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Putin administration. The dossier, paid for by the Demagog Party, claimed that Trump was compromised by evidence of his sexual proclivities in Russia's possession. Steele was the subject of an earlier (unsuccessful) D-notice, which attempted to keep his identity as the author of the dossier a secret.

If Miller and by extension Skripal himself were somehow involved in Orbis' work on the highly suspect Steele--Trump dossier, alongside representatives of British and possibly Pindo intelligence, then all manner of motivations can be suggested for an attack on the ex-Russian spy and British double agent by forces other than Russia's FSB.



Submitted on Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 11:36:51 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Peter Duveen

Become a Fan
Author 20762

(Member since Aug 30, 2008), 28 fans, 35 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2293 comments, 73 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Is it possible that Trump hired Bolton in order to drop him like an egg to pavement? A few have suggested that Trump hired Bolton in line with the American folk saying, "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer."

Submitted on Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 12:34:19 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 34 fans, 69 articles, 262 quicklinks, 4712 comments, 48 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

John Bolton is dangerous to the United States and the World!

Submitted on Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 10:51:51 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment