Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Dershowitz Is Wrong -- Abuse of Power Is Grounds for Impeachment

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   5 comments
Author 7148
Message Marjorie Cohn
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

From Truthout

Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard emeritus law professor who is serving as a hired gun for Team Trump, is arguing that even if John Bolton testifies that Trump admitted the quid pro quo with Ukraine to him, the Senate could not remove the president from office. Dershowitz has gone so far as to say that even if Trump told Bolton he was withholding the congressionally authorized military aid to Ukraine until it helped him with an investigation of the Bidens, that is still not impeachable conduct.

Contrary to the overwhelming weight of scholarly legal thought, Dershowitz has claimed that "high crimes and misdemeanors" is limited to offenses prohibited by statute. He told senators that abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, for which Trump was impeached, are not grounds for impeachment.

Dershowitz used to take the opposite position. During the Clinton impeachment, Dershowitz said no technical crime was required for impeachment, and abuse of trust could be an impeachable offense. "I didn't research it" before, he admitted, but now thinks that "criminal type-acts" are necessary.

Posing a "hypothetical case" before the Senate on January 27, Dershowitz asked senators to assume a Democratic president told Israel he would withhold congressionally authorized foreign aid or an Oval Office meeting unless it stopped building settlements. That would not be an abuse of power, Dershowitz stated, even though he himself "might disapprove of such a quid quo pro demand on policy grounds." What Dershowitz's hypothetical president should really do is ask Congress to reverse the aid authorization because Israel's settlement building violates the Fourth Geneva Convention, which is part of U.S. law.

Abuse of Power Is Not Trump's Only Impeachable Offense

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a political decision to limit the impeachment of Trump to the Ukraine scandal, and the House of Representatives accordingly impeached him for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. But there are many other possible grounds for impeaching Trump, including the obstruction of justice documented in the Mueller report, violation of the Emoluments Clause, the war crime of assassinating Qassim Suleimani, and the withdrawal from the Paris climate accord.

Given Dershowitz's loyal defense of Trump in various arenas, it is no surprise that he disagrees with political historian Allan Lichtman on the question of whether Trump's climate change policy is a crime against humanity and an impeachable offense. (I have also laid out the legal case for why Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement constituted a crime against humanity.)

It was the danger that a president would abuse his power that most concerned the framers. Thus, they provided for impeachment in the Constitution.

"High crimes and misdemeanors" include, but aren't limited to, conduct that the criminal law punishes. Impeachable offenses are political, Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 65. They "proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."

Trump violated the public's trust that he would act in their interests and protect the climate from future disaster. He also violated the trust the people placed in him to conduct foreign policy to further the interests of national security and not the interests of Trump's re-election.

A President Doesn't Need to Break Criminal Law to Be Impeached

Impeachable offenses are not confined to acts prohibited by criminal law. "Unlike a criminal case," the 1974 House Judiciary Committee report for the Nixon impeachment says, "the cause for the removal of a President may be based on his entire course of conduct in office. In particular situations, it may be a course of conduct more than individual acts that has a tendency to subvert constitutional government."

"The argument that only criminal offenses are impeachable has died a thousand deaths in the writings of all the experts on the subject, but it staggers on like a vengeful zombie," Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe argued in The Washington Post. "In fact, there is no evidence that the phrase 'high Crimes and Misdemeanors' was understood in the 1780s to mean indictable crimes."

Tribe wrote that Dershowitz's "suggestion that, even if some noncriminal offenses might be impeachable, 'abuse of power' is not among them is particularly strange." He added: "No serious constitutional scholar has ever agreed with it. The suggestion turns the impeachment power on its head." Indeed, it was the danger that a president would abuse his power that most concerned the framers. Thus, they provided for impeachment in the Constitution.

"I really thought Dershowitz disgraced himself," Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) told CNN's Dana Bash. Dershowitz "said essentially even if a President commands the power of state to corrupt a future election, by seeking the intervention of a foreign power, that that's not something that impeachment would be appropriate for," Merkley added. "It's exactly the type of foreign interference that the founders talked about."

All four constitutional scholars called to testify in the House impeachment inquiry, including Trump's own expert, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, agreed that impeachment does not require a crime and that abuse of power is an impeachable offense.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Marjorie Cohn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marjorie Cohn is professor emerita at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, former president of the National Lawyers Guild, deputy secretary general of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, and a member of the National Advisory Board of Veterans for Peace. Her most recent book is Drones and Targeted Killing: Legal, Moral, and Geopolitical Issues. See  (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stanford Antiwar Alums Call for War Crimes Investigation of Condoleezza Rice

Robert Mueller Is Moving Toward Donald Trump

"Big Brother is Watching You" -- Beyond Orwell's Worst Nightmare

Bradley Manning Treatment Reveals Continued Government Complicity in Torture

Obama's Af-Pak War is Illegal

Obama Spells New Hope for Human Rights

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Apr 4, 2008), 53 fans, 58 articles, 174 quicklinks, 4837 comments, 214 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe described Alan Dershowitz's legal defense of Donald Trump as "remarkably absurd and extreme and dangerous" - call witnesses or face dictatorship. #MakeBelieveTrial.

Submitted on Thursday, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:53:55 PM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help

Maxwell

Become a Fan
Author 4952
(Member since Feb 15, 2007), 2 fans, 4266 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Trump's defense is, in essence, no president can be impeached and removed, ever, despite the section in the Constitution allowing for it. Almost the entire GOP agrees. Until, of course, the occasion to impeach a Democratic president once again occurs.

These star legal scholars--Dershowitz and Starr--are not enhancing their reputations.

Submitted on Thursday, Jan 30, 2020 at 9:34:23 PM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

Lee Beacham

Become a Fan
Author 502584
(Member since May 30, 2015), 1 fan, 700 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Maxwell:   New Content

Abuse of Power is not illegal. It only describes a fact of a an illegal act by the president in this situation. There has been no citing of a provable illegal event. Dems not liking Trump's potential to win a second term is not illegal. Yet.

Submitted on Thursday, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:37:38 PM

  Recommend  (3+)
Help

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 2 fans, 1 quicklinks, 365 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I think Dershowitz's statement was extreme, because I think *some* overreaching of power by a President might warrant removal from office. But, on the other hand, I think Trump's request to "do me a favor" to Zelensky falls far, far short of that kind of abuse. It seems like a matter of degree to me, and I agree with the White House attorneys that there is almost always some component of self interest in anything a politician does, and that, therefor, it doesn't make sense to say that anytime a President does something that is at all in his personal interest that it would be grounds to remove him from office.

Trump discussed a number of issues in the phone call, and, while I wouldn't call the favors he suggested a minuscule part of the call, they weren't the major part, in fact, a rather small part. The Republicans think that too; they don't want what they think of as a hatchet job on the President to take up any more of their time than it has to, and most of them don't want to expand the exercise by calling witnesses.

We'll see what happens tomorrow.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:26:48 AM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help

John Lawrence Ré

Become a Fan
Author 78374
(Member since Apr 17, 2012), 22 fans, 3 articles, 1534 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Typical that the weak, morally bankrupt democrtaic party has chosen one of the few good things Trump has done, i.e., using his Executive muscle to root out neoliberal corruption as the pretext for impeachment, rather than citing attempting the regime change of a sovereign state - which of course would implicate the past several presidents.

The correct view is that is was better Trump did what he did for self-serving reasons, than Obama's annihilating Libya for humanitarian reason.

Regardless, this boring charade is all about getting Trump to do what the neocons in the republican party want him to do. If he does what they want, they will stand by hm, if not - off with his head. Remember, on matters of foreign policy, it's all about duopoly in the service of empire.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:42:08 AM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help