Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Costs and Comparisons - Military Aid to Israel is Uncostitutional - Part 5


Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 504471
New U.S. Budget Includes Increase in Defense Aid to Israel -- For ...
New U.S. Budget Includes Increase in Defense Aid to Israel -- For ...
(Image by forzion.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -


President Obama and Israeli prime minister and Likud party leader Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu reached an agreemnt this year to fund the United States military aid to Israel, currently at $3.1 billion a year, up to $3.8 billion a year from 2018 through 2027. There has been some talk of Republicans increasing that amount. Thus Israel will continue to be the first or second leading recipient of United States foreign aid as it has in recent years, first for example in 2008: $2.38 billion; and 2012: $3.075 billion; and second only to Afghanistan in 2013 at $6.289 billion. Even in 2013 the military aid to Israel of almost $3 billion ($2.961 billion) exceeded the military aid to Afghanistan, where we were engaged in war, by over a billion dollars ($1.879). When it comes to foreign aid, Israel is certainly our most favored nation and it is mostly for military aid.

The military budgets per capita in Israel slightly exceeds that of the US: US = $1,859. Israel = $1,882 per rent year. Given the total population of Israel just about 8.4 million, that means the United States is funding about $452.38 person or about 24% of the Israeli arms budget. That would indicate that about one out of four Palestinians and Muslim men, women and children killed or wounded by the Israel IDF had a rocket or bullet made or provided for them by the United States, and one in four homes, farms and businesses bulldozed and Palestinian properties taken, were performed with equipment made or purchased in or removals paid for by the United States in this long going religious war of conquest that makes the old testament Jericho look lik chicken feed. For more on this see the recent OpEd of David William Pear: "Palestine or Genocide?" It is also enviable as how nice it would be to have an Uncle Sugar pay for a quarter of our annual military budget. The U.S. military budget for fiscal year 2017 is $773.5 billion for fiscal year 2017 (October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017). How nice it would be to have a kind neighbor give us 24% of our defense budget or $185.64 billion.

The United States Coast Guard is charged with protecting 14,506 statute miles of ocean coast line and an additional 4,851 Great Lakes shore line for a total of 19,357 miles of coastal border line. The Israeli Mediterranean coastal plain running from Lebanon to the Gaza strip is 116 miles from north to south. Add the 31-mile length of the Dead Sea on the east and Israel conceivably has 143 miles of cost to protect. Of course, it also blockades approximately another 25 miles of Gaza strip cutting off Palestinian foreign sea trade from there. So legitimately or otherwise, let us say Israel has 168 miles of sea borders to protect. That is less than 1% of the U.S. Coast (.87%). We provide a total Coast Guard budget for 2017 for our coastal defense of $10, 341,548,000. Why should we be giving Israel almost 37% of this amount in 2018 for its defense, unless it is to support its religious wars against the Arab Muslims in Palestine and the Golan Heights (Syria)? Our support is given at a time while Israel is at peace with two of its neighbors, Egypt and Jordan and with its water border a total length of less than 1% of our coast line.

- Advertisement -
While the original declared intent of establishing Israel might have been acceptable, it has strayed far from that intent. On November 2, the British Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, made his landmark Balfour Declaration of 1917, publicly expressing the government's view in favour of "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people", and specifically noting that its establishment must not "prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".

Why do we continue to support these actions so foreign to the stated purposes of our First Amendment Establishment Clause? We shall look into this in part 6.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

AB 1959 and JD 1963, University of Missouri, Columbia. 50 years active member of Washington State Bar Association, mostly civil and commercial office, trial and appellate practice and Superior Court Arbitrator for about 40 years or so, since the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Task Ahead - Military Aid to Israel Is Unconstitutional - Part 7

The DARK Act is Unconstitutional

Join The American Revolution

Dualism of the Mind, Body and Souls, Inner and Outer Peace

ISRAEL IS A THEOCRACY - U.S. AID TO ISRAEL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Part 2

A Legal Precedent for a More Equitable Society