Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 30 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
General News    H4'ed 5/22/09

CA Supreme Court to Issue Prop 8 Ruling on Tuesday

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Rady Ananda
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling on the case questioning the validity of Proposition 8, a voter-based initiative that denies equal treatment under the law to homosexuals in the realm of civil marriage.

Pictured on top row, from left to right are Associate Justices Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, Carlos R. Moreno, Joyce L. Kennard, and Marvin R. Baxter. On bottom from left to right: Associate Justice Ming W. Chin, Chief Justice Ronald M. George, and Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan.

In the consolidated case, Strauss v Horton, the court directed the parties to brief and argue the following issues:

(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution? (See Cal. Const., art. XVIII, sections 1-4.)

In considering this, the Q community regards Proposition 8 a revision, rather than an amendment to the California Constitution.

(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution?

This question been long settled per this 1943 Supreme Court case where Justice Robert  Jackson dissented (though this is now the law):

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." (emphasis added)

Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice Source: West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
As to the third question:

If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?

Retired California civil rights attorney, John Mortimer, doesn’t believe Proposition 8 will be found Constitutional. But if it is, he told me:

“Those marriages remain valid because they were valid as per a Supreme Court ruling before the Constitution was revised. Retroactive application is a very complicated legal issue, but I feel sure it would not apply here.

“If the court were to allow Prop 8 to stand the court commits suicide. It would mean that the court puts a bullet to its own head in that a tyrannous majority could always be able simply finance a voter initiative to rally the angry ignorant villagers with pitch forks. It would be the end of an independent judiciary as we know it in California.”

The states of Iowa, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut recognize same sex marriage for its citizens.

A national Day of Decision action is being organized in anticipation of Tuesday's decision.  State organizers plan to protest or celebrate within twenty-four hours of the decision being published.

News 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Rady Ananda Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend