Businesses supplying stock shots for various publications used to be an integral part of the magazine industry but now that the internet supplies photos for free the stock shot businesses are being diminished by the trend.
A long fact checked story about the demise of the stock shot agencies would have a very limited audience and most of the general public would glance at the headline and move on to other content.
A long and detailed think piece using the incredible shrinking stock photo world to support the assertion that journalism and the free press tradition in the United States are suffering the death of a thousand cuts might attract the attention of reporters who happened to stumble upon it, but the rest of the audience would shrug their shoulders and say: "So what?"
If the World's Laziest Journalist takes some photos at an event this weekend titled "Naked Girls Reading: Dearly Departed," happening in San Francisco, the images might have some news value and would possibly attract some curiosity seekers to next week's installment of our week in review column. (Google hint: sexandculture dot org) They might have more residual stock shot value than the Ralph Nader photos. If he runs for President again, we might get to use the photos as mug shots to go with future columns.
While he was in Berkeley, did Nader notice that the Liberals' wildly enthusiastic support for President Obama seems to be diminishing lately?
If journalism is dying; some might say: "So what?" Police and politicians might be anxious to see the free press go the way of covered wagons, but voters might want to think about it before endorsing that eventuality.
Back in the day, when the weekly news magazines were expected to tout the Establishment's values, the staff could pull an end run on the owners by doing trend spotting stories about the counter culture. If, for example, an outlaw journalist ran for the office of sheriff in Colorado and if the staff of some New York based Establishment publications wanted to ditto his point of view; they couldn't, but by covering that story as an aspect of the pop culture scene, they could say what he was saying and thus get it into their publication.
Austerity budgets and staff cuts have reduced to a considerable degree the window of opportunity for the staff of an Establishment publication to run counter culture material as part of a trend spotting story.
Liberal talk shows on radio seem to be going the way of Wolfman Jack on XERB. Back in the day one man on one radio station was heard regularly in 38 states. Whew! He had "clout."
Recently the World's Laziest Journalist, who has very little interest in sports, stopped into Pappy's Sports bar on Telegraph Ave., in Berkeley (they have a good buger deal that fits our austerity budget requirements) and the one conversation we overheard was critical of the quality of journalism available in the USA. (In a sports bar?) Imagine how mundane TV would be if there were no expressions of traditional sport rivalries permitted.
Will Boston Red Sox fans be ecstatic if it turns out that our prediction that the seventh game of this year's World Series will be decided by a walk off grand slam in the bottom of the ninth hit by Derrick Jeter in his career's last time at bat?
So if a TV network can be relied upon to blame Obama for all the misfortunes in the world today, who is going to waste their time watching that? To quote a line from a Rolling Stones song: "You're so predictable!"
What the hell ever happened to top 10 radio? We skimmed through a copy of Billboard magazine last weekend and didn't know any musicians on their charts. When does a person become too old for a "Good Guys" T-shirt?
The novelty value of Liberal punditry and/or (as George Carlin used to say): "Last week's pick hit of the week, this week's no. one, and next week's Golden Oldie" style radio would be enough to attract a goodly number of listeners who just want to get away from the all propaganda all the time nonsense.
Didn't a European country try out the "One politician, one political philosophy, one nation" approach to pop culture? How did that work out for them?
Speaking of sports, what's with all this subsidizing the sports