Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Wish to be Railroaded

By       Message David Pakman       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   2 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 51800
- Advertisement -

I'm on a train. Not a proverbial train of life, or some other such metaphor, but a real train - the New Haven to Grand Central Station Metro North train I always ride when going to New York City.

It smells terrible. It's old. It's dirty. The seats are ripped and broken. The windows are blurred by years of grime and dust. The fluorescent lighting is depressing and almost useless. Most importantly, it's slow...very slow.

For all the talk over the years on The David Pakman Show about transportation, energy, fast European and Asian trains, and political nonsense around the development of faster American rail, there's no better wake-up call to our sad reality than spending over 100 minutes covering less than 100 miles.

In casual conversation over the years, I've realized that while many do see the problem with America's slow trains, putting aside the sparse availability of Amtrak's slightly faster Acela, too many do not. Some do consider the forces impeding development of advanced technology high-speed rail transportation here, but too many don't.

- Advertisement -

One impediment is politicians, often lawmakers from the Midwest -- and even more often Republicans. When specific proposals for development of high-speed rail come up -- often 10- or 15-year plans to start laying down tracks that can support higher speeds -- these elected officials often decline to participate. This is one specific negative result from the blanket "power of states" so often lauded in conservative and Libertarian ideology.

Another often-ignored or missed factor in the lack of momentum on rail is the involvement of transportation lobbies -- specifically airline and automobile. My particular location and situation is a perfect illustration of what both of those lobbies want to avoid by preventing high speed rail development.

I often travel to Washington, D.C., a 400-mile trip from my home in Massachusetts. I live about 40 minutes north of Bradley International Airport, my "home airport." If I want to drive to D.C., it takes me anywhere from 7 1/2 to 9 hours, depending on traffic. The train from Springfield to Washington takes about 8 hours.

- Advertisement -

If I first drive to New Haven (90 minutes) or take a slow train from Springfield to New Haven, and I time it correctly, I can potentially catch the aforementioned Amtrak Acela, which would cut down my travel time somewhat. If I am to take the 1-hour flight to DCA Airport, the most convenient airport of entry for downtown Washington, the entire trip from door to door, including check-in, security and getting out of DCA, takes about 3 1/2 hours -- assuming there are no delays.

My current preference is to fly. In fact, I've not gone to Washington any other way since I was 10 years old. It costs about $230, assuming I purchase my ticket early enough. And with parking at the airport for three days, plus the cost of gas to get to the airport, we're talking about $275.

This keeps both the automobile manufacturers and airlines happy, because if the train were faster and more convenient, I would certainly opt for it. If trains were faster, airlines would lose out on exactly this type of short trip. Furthermore, for those who live in metro areas, faster trains would mean not only that many people would fly less, they would also drive less, maybe even getting rid of their cars altogether.

For the sake of comparison, let's consider a 200-mile-per-hour train [by no means even close to the fastest trains in the world] which would make the 400-mile trip in about 2 1/2 hours, or slightly longer, depending on the number of stops. I immediately would no longer consider flying on this route, assuming a similar train ticket cost to the $275 I would pay to drive and fly, and the ticket cost could realistically be lower.

As you can see, airline and automobile lobbies have the strongest of interests in preventing the development of high-speed rail, as do oil giants, as increased rail travel would decrease individual fuel consumption and people's carbon footprints -- both of which would be great environmentally, as well as when it comes to logic and reason.

What will it take to really get fast, advanced trains in the U.S.? Even if the country finds the political will to start today, we're still years and years away.

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

David Pakman is the host of The David Pakman Show, an internationally syndicated progressive talk radio and television program airing on over 110 stations across 4 countries, on DirecTV, DISH Network, and across the web on a hugely popular podcast (more...)

David Pakman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Expect Insurers to Pull Out Stops to Prevent Vermont Single Payer Healthcare

Conspiracy Theory Burden of Proof

Fox News Labels Elie Wiesel "Holocaust Winner" & Conveniently Labels Bad Republicans as Dems

What's Worse Than Blind Patriotism? Fake Patriotism

Obama Derangement Syndrome and A Tipping Point for Progress

Mitt Romney & Porn Reveals Much