How did an explosion, verified by seismographic records, wound several people in the basement eight seconds before the first plane struck?
Why did Dan Rather say, “that looks just like when they bring a building down on purpose?”
Why did senior demolitions contractor Danny Jowenko, when he saw bldg 7 fall, say, “That was a controlled demolition?”
Why did Fire Engineer and editor of Fire Engineering magazine Bill Manning say, “…the official investigation by FEMA is a half-baked farce that may have already been commandeered by political forces whose interests, to put it mildly, lay far afield of full disclosure. The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel were not enough in themselves to bring down the towers?”
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the fundamental law of Physics known as conservation of momentum?
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the fundamental law of Physics known as conservation of mass-energy, or e=mc2?
Why are hundreds of architects and engineers saying that the official theory of collapse violates the second law of thermodynamics which states that an asymmetry will increase over time, thus making straight-down collapse impossible?
Why are they saying that even if it collapsed, it could not possibly collapse all the way to the ground?
If 911 was an inside job, would all this make sense?
Why isn’t the media asking these questions?
Why isn’t every American?
Despite an overwhelming media bias supporting the official story, a showbiz tonight e-mail poll received an 81% yes response to the question, “Do you agree there is a government cover-up of 911?” A CNN poll gave an astounding 89% yes response. Whatever they are hiding, it is probably very important, and the American people, in fact, all the world, deserves to know. From a recent Zogby poll, twenty million Americans are convinced that the government made it happen on purpose. Sixty million consider it likely. An enormous 140 million believe the government knew (based on strong evidence) and let it happen on purpose. It sounds like a big difference, but I would suggest that the two theories amount to the same thing. To let it happen on purpose is to invite it. It is complicity already. It is a case for treason.
The strongest argument I have yet heard against the inside job theory is that people cannot believe the government would do it, cannot imagine how they could have done it, or how that many people could keep a secret. First, the CIA has on its website declassified documents concerning Operation Northwood, a false flag (pretending another country was responsible) mission nixed by Kennedy after it got military approval. It involved sinking a US boat, soldiers and all, then blaming it on Cuba. The government can and has done similar ops, openly admitting to many. See Operation Ajax, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty attack, and the Lavon affair, to name a few. The government experimented with radiation on its own citizens from 1944 to 1994 through injections and pills given to unsuspecting participants, even children and pregnant mothers. All secret for fifty years. Google it and see. A prominent Congressman of the time argued that the Great Depression was engineered by the Federal Reserve. (More on this later).
Second is the objection: how could they have accomplished it? Or, it sounds too much like a conspiracy theory. This is double-think of the grossest sort. 19 hijackers could somehow accomplish this, including the NORAD stand-down and the intelligence community’s willful ignoring of massive data. A group of terrorists plotting secretly to hijack planes and fly them into buildings is itself a conspiracy theory. It’s merely the one we’ve been told over and over again. Therefore, we believe it. But look at the ACTUAL EVIDENCE, a small portion of which is above. This seems to be extraordinarily difficult for most people. They simply will not look. Bizarrely, scientists are even more susceptible to this, despite their refrain of basing theories on empirical and forensic data. Sadly, it stems from fear. The dissociative process resulting from ACTUALLY LOOKING and finding out the truth in this matter, threatens the entire world-view.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
