How did collapse occur when NIST (the government investigative body) says the fires were not hot enough to weaken the steel nor the plane damage enough to significantly compromise it?
Why, if the heat weakened the steel, do two firefighters call from the 78th floor requesting two hoses to put out two small fires?
Why is the smoke visibly thick and black, indicative of a cool, poorly burning fire?
Why did a company called Controlled Demolition remove the debris?
Where are the massive flames, aside from the initial fireball, in any of the videos?
Why is there eyewitness testimony from hundreds of firefighters claiming they saw and heard explosions from the towers as they fell?
Why are there more than twenty eyewitness statements claiming it looked just like a deliberate collapse?
Why was video-recorded eyewitness testimony of 500 people, including emergency responders, withheld until the New York Times sued for its release under the Freedom of Information Act?
Why was Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratory, the company that tested the original WTC steel, fired a week after he questioned the results of the NIST report?
Why have six of the hijackers come forward, still alive, protesting their obvious innocence?
Why was the World Trade Center shut down several times, with prior warning, due to power outages in the weeks before?
What are the reports of empty floors, occupants moved around, and loud construction noises in the weeks before 911?
Why was Marvin Bush, the President’s brother, chairman of the board for Securacom, the security contractor for the World Trade Center?
Why was most of the evidence, steel, etc., shipped to China for recycling almost immediately?
Did those who sent the steel away know they were violating federal evidence laws?
Why is the available evidence being withheld in violation of the Freedom of Information Act?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
