" Was it 'conspiracy garbage' that the Vulnerability Assessment
Team (which also monitors nuclear facilities) at Argonne National Laboratory
(the non-profit research lab operated by the University of Chicago for the
Dept. of Energy) released a report earlier this year finding that Diebold's
touch-screen systems and, according to the team's lead scientist, "pretty
much every electronic voting machine", can be hacked with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science
education , or just $26 if you want to do it remotely?
" Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when, in Volusia County, FL's 2000
Presidential Election a paper-based optical-scan tabulator made by Global
Elections Management Systems (GEMS, thereafter purchased by Diebold to become
Diebold Election Systems, Inc.) tallied negative 16,022 votes for Al Gore thanks to a supposed "software flaw" which
has never been explained
by anyone, and which Leon County (Tallahassee), FL's Supervisor of Elections
Ion Sancho --- the man, so well respected by both major parties, that he was
placed in charge of the aborted 2000 Presidential Election recount in Florida
--- believes was a purposeful hack of the electronic tabulation system which is
now used in hundreds of counties in dozens of states?
***
So what do you think, readers? Do you think we have something to worry about? Or should we all "trust the machines" and get back to our shopping?
Join the discussion on Facebook at the best online organizing hub for election integrity: Occupy Rigged Elections.
Despite the name, it's actually non-partisan, totally focused, and a great place to educate yourself and others.
Steven Rosenfeld and Chuck Todd, we hope to
see you there.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
11
9
6
