More importantly -- if true -- why didn't they do anything about it?
Returning to al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar, the two alleged terrorists at the Kuala Lumpur meeting: we have an actual revelation here, and one which should absolutely raise suspicions:
"In January 2000, CTC officers received information that one of these suspected terrorists had a US visa; in March 2000, these officers had information that the other had flown from Bangkok to Los Angeles."
This is black and white admission that "these" CIA "officers" had "information" that an Al Qaeda "terrorist" had entered the United States; yet they did nothing whatsoever about it. As a matter of fact, the two "terrorists" lived openly under their own names for a year and a half. Nawaf al-Hazmi was even reportedly listed in the San Diego telephone book.
The CIA IG then spins on behalf of the CTC, in a mindboggling paragraph which attempts to distract from the core issue, that al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi were deliberately allowed to enter and remain in the United States, although they were identified as "UBL associates." The FBI agent assigned to the CIA CounterTerrorism Center wrote a memo to inform the FBI of the visa issue, but:
"Apparently because it was in the wrong format or needed editing, the message was never sent."
I'm not sure if excuses like these would fly in junior high school, but this is what our $40 Billion "Intelligence Community" has come up with to explain away 9/11.
"Whatever the case, the Team found no indication that anyone in CTC checked to ensure FBI receipt of the information, which, a few UBL station officers said, should have been routine practice."
There's that old violaton of standard operating procedures concerning 9/11 again. This FBI memo affair was on January 5th of 2000 (yes, under the Clinton regime).
Just two months later -- coincidentally -- the same failure to inform the FBI happened again over at the CIA/CTC:
"Seperately in March 2000, two CIA field locations sent to a number of addresses cables reporting that al-Hazmi and another al-Qa'ida associate had traveled to the United States. Tney were clearly identified in the cables as "UBL associates." The Team has found no evidence, and heard no claim from any party, that this information was shared in any manner with the FBI or that anyone in UBL station took other appropriate operational action at that time."
By the CIA's own admission, numerous parties in their own organization were informed that two Al Qaeda terrorists had entered the country. This information was broadcast to their officers, yet withheld from the FBI, and no criminal investigations or arrests resulted.
This is glaring evidence of wrongdoing. Taken in context with thousands of other facts, we have a prima facie case for treason.
We're just not allowed to call it treason in the corporate media, which controls the mass consciousness.
Certain parties in the CIA and in the FBI acted to prevent criminal investigations of known terrorists. These parties have committed treason, and were complicit with the 9/11 attacks, and thereby generated a "Global War on Terrorism," which seems to be their motive. This CIA IG report, along with other relevant documentation, should be taken to federal judges and presented as evidence of high treason.
This reality is confirmed by several whistleblowers, such as FBI Special Agent Robert Wright, who said:
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
