Apparently, around 2004, Americans began finally to review the film again.
Below is an excellent review of the film, WRONG IS RIGHT , by Derrick Lyle —with the one problem in Lyle’s narration being that the author thought the 1982 movie was “science fiction” at the time.
As I indicated above, it was not science-fiction. It was satire and described the world of the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s as well as it describes 2003-2007.
In short, in 1982 the film WRONG IS RIGHT was, indeed, partially prophetic but mostly it was analytic of the existing news media I had grown up with.
So, if you have never seen the film or have forgotten about it, get hold of a copy this 2007 before the Writers’ Strike ends and demand it be shown over and over again on TV. Maybe we can stop further wars in 2008!
DERRICK LYLE’S COMMENTSHere is a 90% accurate positive review of the film that should wet your appetite:
“I agree with the positive reviews others have posted. I won't spoil anything for those who have not seen it, but the film is disturbingly accurate to the reality of the past few years (circa 2004). Wrong Is Right is a black comedy and an excellent work of science fiction. The credit goes to Richard Brooks as well as original author Charles McCarry. Based on McCarry's 1979 novel ‘The Better Angels’, Wrong Is Right takes a comedic twist, and touches on topics few could have easily digested during the Reagan Presidency of 1982.”“The plot revolves around globetrotting news-hound Patrick Hale (Sean Connery), who uncovers a major international crisis, and must contend with a sinister President, the CIA, and international terrorists. The original intent of director Richard Brooks was to illustrate how technology could bring TV news closer to the truth, and exploit it for ratings. Taking essential cues from the novel, Mr. Brooks leads the viewer into a hazy world in which technology and television manipulate reality for personal gains. The movie accurately predicts the rise of cable and satellite TV. It nails the what-ifs of a media outlet (Fox Broadcasting/Fox News Channel come to mind). And it's an early look at how computers and modern technology affect society. The big clincher is that the movie literally provides a twisted take on the Bush Administration - I kid you not.”
“Remember, this movie was made during the Cold War. No one worried about America fighting anyone else but the Soviet Union. Cable television, while gaining steam, was nowhere near as engrossing or developed as it is today. And no one in America cared about suicide bombers. Do yourself a favor and rent or purchase the video/DVD. Enjoy the movie for the spectacle it is. And realize what was science fiction years before is now a freakish parody of today.”
“The acting, the pacing, and the writing are good to great, considering the topic. It gets funnier as the film finishes. Just remember, the cast and crew were on eggshells, as the film itself is groundbreaking. It is a political satire predating its subject matter. And for another generation, it becomes far more familiar and timely than Dr. Strangelove.”
–Derrick Lyle (2004) Internet Movie Database
NOTES Stoda, Kevin, “WRITERS’ STRIKE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES: Think! Instead of Watching Reruns—Change the World: Day 1”http://the-teacher.blogspot.com/2007/11/writers-strike-provides-opportunities.html Stoda, Kevin, “WRITERS' STRIKE PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES: Think! Instead of Watching Reruns-Change the World: Day 2” http://www.opednews.com/articles/life_a_alone_071106_writers__strike_prov.htmWHEN RIGHT IS WRONG (1982), http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084920/
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
