In case you're asking yourself why American officials did not have him arrested, bin Laden had been lying in a Dubai hospital in July of 2001 and was actually visited by the local CIA chief. The man did not attempt to have him arrested. No assassination squad visited him in the dead of night. Whatever the visit was about, we do not know. And yet, at the time, bin Laden was wanted for the Embassy bombing.
In fact, as I understand it, Osama bin Laden was an employee of the CIA and worked under the alias "Tim Osman." To this day he has never been charged by the FBI with 9/11. He was not indicted before a grand jury, probably because that would have caused some embarrassing questions to be asked and some treasonous facts to be revealed.
The
search for bin Laden ended years ago. The CIA unit responsible for
seeking him was disbanded. George Bush lost interest in him.
It is suspected that he died as long ago as December 2001.
Yet Hilary Clinton still beats the bushes, saying he is alive, that the Pakistanis are harboring him, and that he must be found.
Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State. How could she not have access to the information that bin Laden is in all likelihood dead? Does it not impugn Clinton's credibility to be accusing our erstwhile allies, who actually did harbor bin Laden once, probably at the CIA's request, of harboring what in all likelihood is a dead man?
So far in this article, we've seen no evidence of Muslim involvement.
But let's look closer. Yes, we do have reports of Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence General Mahmud Ahmad receiving $100,000 from American sources in Washington on 9/11 which allegedly were paid to "Mohammed Atta." So, yes, some Muslims caused 9/11: A general in the Pakistani ISI was involved.
But you can't persuade me that the Homeland Security Department was begun to protect us from the ISI. It was begun to protect us from Muslim "terrorists," none of whom existed.
When a government behaves in this manner, creating a phony event in order to start a war or restrict the civil liberties of its citizens, we call it a "false-flag" operation.
There is reason to believe that the destruction of the U.S.S. Maine was a false-flag operation.
The Japanese created a false-flag incident to kickstart their invasion of China. Hitler burned down the Reichstag in a false-flag operation.
President Roosevelt came precious near to one by failing to report that he knew a Japanese fleet was bearing down on Pearl Harbor. He wanted America to join World War II and so he kept his knowledge hidden.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of State Lyman Lemnitzer was planning a false-flag incident against Cuba in the 1960s, revealed by the now-infamous Northwoods report. (Google.)
President Johnson created a false-flag operation, claiming an American warship was attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin when none was.
He also ordered the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, which was also a false-flag incident, designed to draw the U.S. into a war with Egypt. Unfortunately the Liberty refused to sink.
The list goes on and on. False-flag incidents are commonly used by all countries to create a pretext for war or a domestic crackdown, such as the United States experienced under George Bush.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
