Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 38 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H3'ed 2/23/16

Scalia Lovefest? Not So Fast

By       (Page 3 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   3 comments, 4 series
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Become a Fan
  (89 fans)

There is no so-called "Thurmond rule" in the Constitution that prohibits the confirmation of a supreme court judge in the last year of the residency. I am hardly the first person to point out that Justice Kennedy was confirmed in the last year of the Reagan presidency by a vote of 97-0.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell didn't wait for Scalia's body to get cold before announcing he would not even allow a hearing, let alone a vote, on an Obama nominee to the Supreme Court. This is contrary not only to precedent, but to the Constitution itself, as I previously noted. McConnell is betting that the Senate Republicans need to remain obstructionist in order to placate its Tea Party zealots, who turn out at the polls in strong numbers.

Secondly, the generally 5-4 right-wing Supreme Court has been possibly more important than Congress in determining legal policies that affect the nation. The Republicans have long understood the importance of the Supreme Court and federal bench as a means of, ironically, legislating from the bench. The Democrats have been relatively obsequious in the battle for federal judicial appointments, while the Republicans take no prisoners in opposing federal appointments.

That McConnell so inappropriately, in timing, announced that the Republican Senate majority would not even allow a judicial committee hearing for an Obama appointee is testament to how powerfully the narrow right-wing control of the Supreme Court has changed the country to favor the wealthy, to limit the power of non-whites and women (in general), and to further the interests of Republicans in winning elections, among other public policy tilts against progress.

The 5-4 on the Supreme Court, of which Scalia was a part, was more an extension of a Republican Congress than a separate branch of government. McConnell wants to keep it that way, and is hoping for a Republican to win the White House and be sworn in in 2016 - and for Republicans to maintain control of the Senate.

JB: Clearly, my wish list is a whole lot different than McConnell's. Anything you'd like to add before we wrap this up?

MK: Remember that the 2016 battle over a Supreme Court nominee is going to be as political as an actual issue of confirmation. Both the Republicans and the Democrats are going to use the nomination politically as proof of how important it is their voters turn out, because the next president will pick the crucial swing vote. I don't, myself, see any circumstances in which the Senate Republicans would allow an Obama nominee to be seated, unless it was someone like Rick Santorum.

JB: Yikes! What a concept. Thanks so much for talking with me again, Mark. It's always a pleasure.


My previous interviews with Mark:

Was Ike Twice the Socialist That Bernie Is? 1.24.2016

Perusing the News with Editor, Mark Karlin 9.7.2015

also worth a look:
Jeffrey Toobin Looking Back Feb. 29, 2016 issue of the New Yorker

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 1   Funny 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Other Series: View All 27 Articles in "justice"

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: