Michael Connelly (the CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER) states that he actually read the bill, and then proceeds to name a bunch of things that it will definitely do, but offers absolutely no evidence. None. He simply states them so matter-of-factly and all of his page commenters eat it up like ambrosia. The things he mentions have been debunked many times. He doesn't even cite where the information is located in the bill on this "definitely will do" list. He then argues, as a constitutional lawyer, that the bill is unconstitutional because the Constitution doesn't mention healthcare. Here we go again. I guess he forgot about the part where it says "promote the general welfare". Is he also going to argue that Medicare and Social Security are unconstitutional? What about the VA? GI Bill? Should I keep going?
btw...
Here is what the non-partisan website � ���"FactCheck.org� �� � says about the Healthcare plans.
You can also go here to see this on their website and look at other things they have Fact Checked.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-lies-about-hr-3200/
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).