258 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 25 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
Life Arts   

Maia Szalavitz on Love as a Drug, and Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

By       (Page 3 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

For further information about the 1970s Wonder Woman fantasy television series, starring the busty (37") young Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman, see the Wikipedia entry on "Wonder Woman (TV series)":

Click Here

Also see the Wikipedia entry titled "List of Wonder Woman episodes":

wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wonder_Woman_episodes

For further information about Lynda Carter, see the Wikipedia entry "Lynda Carter":

Click Here

In any event, the buxom comic book fantasy figure of Wonder Woman emerged from the imagination of the Harvard-educated (A.B., LL.B., and Ph.D.) Harvard professor William Moulton Marson (1893-1947). Because I accentuate young Lynda Carter's big (37") boobs in the present essay, I want to note here that the comic book Wonder Woman figure was buxom - and young Lynda Carter's wonderfully revealing Wonder Woman costume was designed to resemble the buxom fantasy comic book Wonder Woman's costume.

For further information about him, see the Wikipedia entry "William Moulton Marston":

Also see Harvard historian Jill Lepore's exhaustive book titled The Secret History of Wonder Woman, 2nd ed. (Vintage Books, 2015).

In any event, the buxom comic book fantasy figure of Wonder Woman emerged in American culture in the early 1940s, when American culture was deeply misogynistic. The 1970s Wonder Woman television series emerged in American culture alongside second-wave feminism to counter and combat the deep misogyny of American culture. Today the deep misogyny in American culture is manifested in President Donald Trump's misogyny - and in the misogyny of Trump's male MAGA supporters. Today misogynistic American men are not candidates for working through the liberation of endogamous kinship libido that is "married within" their psyches to their early childhood image on their moms (or their mother-figures).

Now, I borrow the expression endogamous kinship libido from Ong's succinct summary of the Jungian analyst Erich Neumann's grand synthesis of Jung's work in his landmark book titled The Origins and history of Consciousness, translated by R. F. C. Hull (Pantheon Books, 1954; orig. German ed., 1949). Ong sets forth his succinct summary of Neumann's Jungian account of the eight stages of consciousness in his (Ong's book Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture (Cornell University Press, 1971, pp. 10-11):

"The stages of psychic development as treated by Neumann are successively (1) the infantile undifferentiated self-contained whole symbolized by the uroboros (tail-eater), the serpent with its tail in its mouth, as well as by other circular or global mythological figures [including Nietzsche's imagery about the eternal return?], (2) the Great Mother (the impersonal womb from which each human infant, male or female, comes, the impersonal femininity which may swallow him [or her] up again), (3) the separation of the world parents (the principle of opposites, differentiation, possibility of change, (4) the birth of the hero (rise of masculinity and of the personalized ego) with its sequels in (5) the slaying of the mother (fight with the dragon: victory over primal creative but consuming femininity, chthonic forces), and (6) the slaying of the father (symbol of thwarting obstruction of individual achievement, [thwarting] what is new), (7) the freeing of the captive (liberation of the ego from endogamous [i.e., "married" within one's psyche] kinship libido and the emergence of the higher femininity, with woman now as person, anima-sister, related positively to ego consciousness), and finally (8) the transformation (new unity in self-conscious individualization, higher masculinity, expressed primordially in the Osiris myth but today entering new phases with heightened individualism [such as Nietzsche's overman] - or, more properly, personalism - of modern man [sic])."

Ong also sums up Neumann's Jungian account of the stages of consciousness in his (Ong's) book Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness (Cornell University Press, 1981, pp. 18-19; but also see the "Index" for further references to Neumann [p. 228]), the published version of Ong's 1979 Messenger Lectures at Cornell University.

I have quoted Ong's succinct summary of the eight stages of consciousness from Ong's 1971 book Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology in my essay "Secondary Orality and consciousness Today" in the well-organized anthology titled Media, Consciousness, and Culture: Explorations of Walter Ong's Thought, edited by Bruce E. Gronbeck, Thomas J. Farrell, and Paul A. Soukup (Sage Publishing, 1991, pp. 194-209).

Now, on some level of my psyche and consciousness, I am sure that busty (37") young Lynda Carter's big (37") boobs reminded me of my Mom's big boobs. Consequently, my extraordinary infatuation with busty (37") young Lynda Carter in the fall of 2024 helped me further experience the liberation of endogamous kinship libido that is "married within" my psyche to my early childhood image of my Mom and her big breasts. When I speak of working through the liberations of endogamous kinship libido that is "married within" my psyche to my early childhood image of my mom in my psyche, I assume that my early childhood image of my Mom included her breasts.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEd News welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEd News rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend