Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H2'ed 2/2/17

Jonathan Simon: Votecounts As 'Alternative Facts'

By       (Page 3 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   15 comments, 5 series
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Become a Fan
  (87 fans)

It's going to take more than protests and petitions and individual or mass hand-wringing. Everything these days is about money. If we didn't know that, we have Trump and his Plutocrat Myrmidons to remind us. So what might just give pause are things that hit below the national money belt. I am talking about mass actions, nonviolent but tremendously potent: massive consumer boycotts, massive tax revolts (put the money in escrow, contingent on the meeting of demands), focal and general strikes, sit-ins at county elections offices and media outlets, Election Night Opscan Parties (as described in my book, CODE RED).

Code Red: Computerized Election Theft and the New American Century, Election 2016 Edition
Code Red: Computerized Election Theft and the New American Century, Election 2016 Edition
(Image by courtesy of Jonathan Simon)
  Details   DMCA

If we blanch at the mere thought of such "European style" actions here in Exceptional America, what do we propose instead? Quiet (or noisy) submission? Armed revolt? Or continuing dutifully to vote, let Dominion and ES&S do the counting in the pitch-dark of cyberspace (after Crosscheck and all the old and new schemes of Jim Crow voter suppression have stripped down the electorate to riggable dimensions), and keep hoping for the best? Is that not the textbook definition of insanity--exactly what we've been doing now for years?

Albert Einstein defined insanity as
Albert Einstein defined insanity as 'doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

Hmmm. I like to end these interviews on a positive note. What have you got for us, Jonathan? I realize it's a stretch for you.

Well, for starters, let me thank you for talking with me again and for all these good questions! But I meant the tail part of my response to your last question as something of a "positive note." There's a difference between positive and pleasant.

Silly me!

Who knows, Joan? We may see impeachment (Lord knows the high crimes and misdemeanors will be piling up); we might even see invocation of the 25th Amendment's provisions, which serve as a kind of expedited removal, meant for cases of incapacitating presidential illness, physical or mental. As stacked with scorched-earthers as Trump's cabinet will be, a majority might still be willing to step up and put the brakes on Grade-A insanity, though it's no longer very clear how that would be defined. And there is always the possibility that Trump himself will snap out of what seems best explained as an existential and post-menopausal power trip to rival that of General Jack D. Ripper's , for anyone who remembers their Dr. Strangelove, and settle down to merely governing badly.

But none of those relatively "good" outcomes will do much if anything to deal with the underlying problem, which is that, through the insidious corruption of our electoral process, the American public has lost its sovereignty--the majority no longer rules. In that quest, as crazy as it seems, Trump may be the best thing we have going. Think about it: Obama's election and presidency were like novocaine for election integrity efforts. His victories put millions off the scent: how could he possibly win if the Right could have rigged him out? The answers to that are a whole other interview, but suffice it to say the two are not incompatible. Then on his watch, and despite his relative popularity (GW Bush exited office with an Approval Rating of 22%; Obama's was 58%), Democratic office-holders were routed at every level of government, with 2016 just the capstone set on Rove's stated goal of a "permanent Republican majority." And not a word said or an eyebrow raised by this most intelligent president or his party about result after shocking result and all the forensic red flags. I am not sure that, if Clinton were now president, or even Pence, things would be all that different.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Other Series: View All 89 Articles in "Overcoming Challenges"

Other Series: View All 62 Articles in "grassroots"

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers