56 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 70 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 7/10/13

Fracking a Flock of Pandoras

By       (Page 3 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message j dial
Become a Fan
  (33 fans)

 

Gas drillers are now going after the "unconventional" sources of gas made available by fracking.  Because they're drilling into uranium resources, this new gas is contaminated with many times the radiation held by conventional sources.  Shales in the US that hold all this suddenly available gas also harbor radiation at a concentration 5,000 times higher--between 16 and 20 parts per million uranium--than what is scattered in the crust. 

 

The vast quantities of gas in US shales that will make us "energy independent", in addition to leaking greenhouse-potent methane, are also liberally dosed with radioactivity.  [5]  

 

Uranium's Issue

 

All natural gas carries a certain amount of radon.  As the uranium in any rock decays, radon is constantly produced.  When that natural gas is removed from a uranium deposit, it bears more radon than would natural gas taken from non-uranium-laced rocks.  Because radon decays rapidly, it is highly radioactive.  Yet it remains viable long enough to reach its point of consumption, such as your home.  As it emits with natural gas on your stovetop, the flames do not affect it.  An inert gas that does not react with other elements, it enters the room unscathed where it is available for breathing.  

 

We are told that the amount of radon in natural gas is relatively scanty.  Cooking and heating with gas exposes residents to only 15 times more radioactivity than what you'd receive living next door to a nuclear reactor and using nuclear electricity for cooking and heating rather than gas.  Although that amount may not sound so minuscule, reactors emit so little radiation that 15 times as much still isn't much.  But that information is about the safety of nuclear reactors; it is not about natural gas. 

According to the Department of Energy, the ratio of radon to uranium in a formation remains relatively constant even as the uranium content varies, and so if we know how much uranium resides in a formation from which gas is being extracted, we can have a pretty good idea how much radon we're getting as well.  Although it is not in the interest of the gas industry to advertise it, some of the richest reserves of natural gas reside in Devonian shale, which is rich in marine black shale.  Such shale has a generous organic component, which attracts and concentrates radioactive uranium before it bakes into the hydrocarbons we seek.  So the best sources of unconventional hydraulically fractured natural gas are by their nature radioactive. 

 

As we've seen, shale that is the most radioactive contains the most gas.  According to David Lewis:  "The shale formations they want to find gas in can have as much as 250 ppm U238.   If they have that much they are 80 times as radioactive as 'normal average', good old red-blooded American conventional gas. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

J Dial Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Schooled in psychology and biomedical illustration, of course I became a medical writer!

In 2014 my husband and I and our kitty moved from Colorado, where Jerry had been born, to Canada, where I had been. (Born.)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Turned Scientific American?

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Where Have all the Finches Gone?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend