On its Web site, Campus Crest outlines a high-minded set of corporate values. It includes this statement:
"The student is the heart and soul of Campus Crest and the source of our inspiration, dedication and drive. Every day, we strive to go above and beyond to provide unparalleled service to them, their parents and the institutions they attend. With each class that graduates, we are helping build the future and we take that responsibility very seriously."
Campus Crest takes its responsibilities seriously? That's funny because public documents indicate its CEO should be in jail for failure to pay child and family support--and failure to maintain an "undisturbed" home for his wife and children during the divorce case.
I recently asked Ted Rollins' lawyer to provide documents showing that his client paid court-ordered support in South Carolina. I've received no reply. I asked Ted Rollins to explain his failure to pay court-ordered support in South Carolina. I've received no reply.
Consider just this one issue I raised in an e-mail to Ted Rollins:
The South Carolina court ordered you to maintain mortgage and insurance payments on the family home. Sherry Rollins states that the monthly mortgage payment was roughly $4,500. A judge had ordered you to make sure that Ms. Rollins and your daughters had "undisturbed use of the home throughout the pendency of the case." The case went on for roughly another 33 months, and payments obviously were missed because Ms. Rollins was kicked out of the house and wound up having to provide for her own shelter--and the shelter for your daughters.
Why did Ted Rollins fail to provide "undisturbed use of the home," as ordered by a South Carolina judge? Why did Rollins allow his wife and two children to be kicked out of their home, contrary to an order from a South Carolina judge? Why was a bench warrant for Ted Rollins' arrest lifted when he clearly violated court orders on multiple grounds?
Mr. Rollins and his lawyer, Chad Essick, are quick to send threatening letters to me for reporting on the Rollins v. Rollins divorce case--and I suspect I will receive another one. But they seem to be in no hurry to answer questions such as the ones above.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
