From Tom Neltner, Juris Doctorate, Chemical Policy Director of the Environmental Defense Fund, published September 14, 2018:
"In a critical ruling for food safety, a federal district court judge ruled that the EDF, has standing in its legal challenge to FDA's Generally Recognized as Safe Rule. This 2016 final rule allows food manufacturers to make secret GRAS safety determinations for chemicals added to food without out anyone else's knowledge. The Federal Judge stated that EDF and the Center for Food Safety 'plausibly allege harm to their members,' and therefore 'satisfy the injury-in-fact' requirements for standing."
That Judge stated that "Their members have been and will be exposed to potentially dangerous substances that were introduced into the food supply without FDA oversight, participation, or the opportunity for Judicial review."
They "explicitly identify multiple substances that manufacturers determined to be GRAS and used in food despite concerns raised by the FDA about their safety, as well as additional undisputedly dangerous substances that plaintiffs reasonably anticipate will be introduced into into the food supply under GRAS rules. These injuries are ongoing and imminent. The Court also rejected FDA's arguments potential injury from unsafe chemicals added to food, and said that litigants are not required to show that harm was unavoidable because the safety determination and often the chemical names were publicly unknown." [The defendant was the FDA.]
The Court found arguments by FDA that a stronger rule might not make a difference as "overly simplistic," stating that it assumes a lack of enforcement or incompetence on the part of the FDA.
The American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement of July 2018 called for FDA to greatly strengthen the GRAS-determination process.
_______________________________
There are a great many more of these harmful chemicals that have been listed at my article's site, using the search term
UNITED NATIONS UNDERSECRETARY GENERAL FOR NUTRITION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION, if any member of the court wishes to share this information with the Heads of State and Health Ministers and Secretaries of your own nation, as well all members of the United Nations.
I am ready to further educate the Court in these matters at any point, and to corroborate why I included these food additives, artificial coloring proven to be carcinogenic, et cetera.
_________________________
Concludo: With your concurrence, individually or severally or en banque, to order the FDA Commissioner to to rescind aspartame's approval henceforth, we are one step closer to correcting Donald Trump's regulatory processes and removing this tumor-accelerating, neurotoxic excitotoxin, and abortion-causing lethal poison from all internationally traded food products.
The most egregious nations producing this aspartame, after USA, include China, Japan, and various subsidiaries of Ajinomoto of Japan, which are located in Europe and Brasil.
I know of none in the continent of Africa, so that must be part of the reason for William Henry Gates III's focus on Africa, since formaldehyde can be used as an adjuvant in his deadly injections as a pandemic profiteer in a swath from Equatorial Guinea to Somalia, and in various South American nations.
___________________________
Remember that every USA president since 1981 has been adversely affected by aspartame poisoning, including the present USA President, whose consumption of 12 cans a day of Diet Cokes were variously reported in the New York Times and the Toronto Globe and Mail.
Donald Rumsfeld might be able to respond to your questions, but they should be forwarded at this time to Fatou Bensouda, former Justice Minister of Gambia, and not take up YOUR valuable time or that of your staff.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
