IMPORTANT STORY, AND DONE THEIR DUTY TO INFORM THEIR
READERS AND VIEWERS, AND ALSO TO DIG DEEPER INTO WHAT
THIS MASSIVE DISCREPANCY IN THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF
9/11 PORTENDS FOR ALL THE REST OF THEIR "THEORY" ??
3) -------------------------------------------
In your article's 9th paragraph you state:
"The standards and technology institute, and many
mainstream scientists, won't debate conspiracy
theorists, saying they don't want to lend them
unwarranted credibility."
PROBLEM:
The "official story" that 19 ragtag hijackers who
could barely fly Cessnas, flying commercial jet liners with expert precision many experienced pilots say they couldn't accomplish, and fooling the US Air Force, NORAD, and the FAA so that in one and a half hours of flying these hijacked planes over some of the world's most protected airspace . . . with not one, not one .
. . Air Force interceptor jet arriving until too late, and completely obliterating the first three steel reinforced skyscrapers in building engineering history with jet fuel (which doesn't approach the temperature required to melt steel) . . . IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY.
IT'S AN OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY.
plane, so when your article says the buildings were
brought down by jet fuel, while ignoring building 7's fall . . . is shoddy journalism at best, and a cover up at worst.
As the truth continues to unfold, media should and
must be held accountable for the horrid job they've
done reporting on 9/11, but worse for their obvious
attempts to obstruct public knowledge of crucial
facts.
Warm regards, and FOR GODSAKE, DO YOUR HOMEWORK in the future. You are supposed to be a professional media.
9/11 truth seeker, and faithful citizen.
For anyone who'd like to contact ABCnews.com, or Associated Press:
support@abcnews.go.com, info@ap.org
ABC NEWS CONTACTS:
support@abcnews.go.com
http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html?cat=good%20morning%20america
ASSOCIATED PRESS CONTACT:
info@ap.org
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
