I’m confident that his strategic mind and political track record allowed him to foresee what is coming “I was fully aware of what kind of response calling someone a Judas would evoke.”
It is also obvious that he planned to make the case all along, but regrettably, the article missed the mark by a wide margin. Instead of helping his candidate, he made a good argument for why the voters in this election cycle are demanding real change and rejecting candidate’s experience in Washington as an asset.
It would be naive to think that all political appointments based only on qualifications, and it is conceivable that some political deals behind closed doors should never see the daylight. However, the culture of reciprocal favors promoted in this article under the loyalty brand name is the one that merits an insult.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
