Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 67 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

VETERANS TARGET OF THIRD-PARTY SLURS

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Larry Scott
Message Larry Scott
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
Buried in the just-passed VA budget bill is an amendment that requires the VA to inform Illinois veterans that they may not have received benefits at a proper level and tells them how to ask for a review of an existing benefits claim and how to file a new claim. The outcome of these new claims and claim reviews could substantially raise monthly compensation for thousands of veterans and would include retroactive payments.

This new VA requirement applies not only to veterans in Illinois, but also to veterans in Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey, Indiana and Connecticut. The VA was found to be granting veterans' benefits in those six states at a rate lower than in other states.

It's interesting to note that Indiana is on this list. Yet, Rep. Buyer, who claims to be fighting for the veterans in his Fourth Indiana Congressional District, is silent on this issue. One would think that he would be praising Senators Durbin and Obama for helping Indiana veterans. But, kind words for Democrat politicians would not be well-received by the Republican hierarchy that put Buyer into the Chair at HCVA and now demands his absolute loyalty. At least the veterans of Indiana have two good Illinois Senators to look after them.

I have no doubt that Rep. Buyer will continue his politically-motivated war on veterans by using the words of others. His campaign of third-party slurs fits right in with current Republican Party politics. His disregard for veterans in his own district has caused them, for many years, to receive VA benefits at a level lower than veterans in other states.

Rep. Steve Buyer's position as Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs demands a higher standard of conduct when it comes to serving veterans. Will he try to elevate himself to that higher standard, or will he continue to show contempt and disrespect for those who have given so much for this country?

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Larry Scott Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Larry Scott served four years in the U.S. Army with overseas tours as a Broadcast Journalist in Korea and the Azores and a stateside tour as a Broadcast Journalism Instructor at the Defense Information School (DINFOS). He was awarded DOD's First Place Thomas Jefferson Award for (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Push to cut Benefits for Vets who get VA and Social Security Compensation

BUYING-OUT DISABLED VETERANS

TSA Looks to VA and DoD for “Mental Defectives”

Why Doesn't the VA tell Veterans About Their Benefits?

SECRETIVE VA LAUNCHES NEW PTSD REVIEW

VETERANS' BENEFITS ARE NOT SAFE

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend