47 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Why is Britain Tolerating David Miliband?

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Message Rakesh Krishnan Simha
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

Criticising his naïve remarks welcoming Georgia to Nato and baiting Russia, Lord Skidelsky, emeritus professor of political economy at the University of Warwick, asked him to "talk sense" and "stop playing with fire".

After the diplomatic disaster in Delhi, it is apparent the foreign secretary has not listened to that advice. One reason could be that while the Cold War has turned to thaw, Miliband remains frozen in a time warp.

His efforts to isolate Moscow have been thwarted by Russia's resurgence on the geopolitical scene led by the master strategist, Vladimir Putin. And India's slow but sure progress to great power status is leaving less and less room for Britain in the Commonwealth, which seems likely to go the way of the International Cricket Council that was once Britain’s private club, but is now controlled by India.

Perhaps Miliband was trying to get back at the Indians for the drubbing they gave another British foreign secretary. In 1997, when Robin Cook offered to mediate in the Kashmir crisis, the then Indian Prime Minister I.K. Gujaral told his guest he was the envoy of a "third-rate power" which shouldn't be "poking its nose in" India's affairs.

It remains to be seen how Miliband’s meeting with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will go. Five days before George W. Bush left office, Miliband wrote in an article in The Guardian that Bush's war on terror was “deceptive and misleading”. At a time when British soldiers are auxiliaries in the American military machine, it was hypocrisy at its best. And while the foreign secretary's article was timed to curry favour with the new American administration, it's unlikely to impress the Americans. President Barack Obama is already ramping up the US presence in Afghanistan.

Miliband’s implacable resentment of Russia and now his graceless behaviour in India are clear indicators that he is unfit to be a foreign secretary, let alone prime minister. By retaining his services, Britain risks strained relations with even more countries.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Rakesh Krishnan Simha Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rakesh Krishnan Simha is a New Zealand-based writer.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

BRICS: Shaking the world order

Exodus: Is the Christian church losing critical mass?

Mother Teresa: Giving Charity an Uncharitable Name

The Bilderberg Group: Sealing the world's fate behind closed doors

Welcome to Colonialism 2.0

How India's Cold Start is Turning the Heat on Pakistan

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend