Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 84 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/8/17  

War Not Only Kills People: It's the Single Biggest Destroyer of the Environment.

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   7 comments, In Series: War Must and Can Be Ended
Author 68443
Editor

Robert Anschuetz
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Anschuetz
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

--Non-nuclear bombs in World War II destroyed cities, farms, and irrigation systems, producing 50 million refugees and displaced persons; and U.S. bombing of Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia produced 17 million refugees. Great damage to existing ecosystems has been done through the war-caused displacement of populations around the world to less habitable areas.

--Wars leave a lot of dangerous stuff behind--including, for example, the huge quantity of chemical weapons the U.S. dumped into the Atlantic and Pacific oceans between 1944 and 1970. A U.S. ship carrying a million pounds of mustard gas sunk by German bombs in World War II is expected to keep leaking the gas into the sea for centuries. And, among over 1,000 U.S. and Japanese ships left on the floor of the Pacific Ocean in World War II, one was found to still be leaking oil in 2001.

--Land mines are among the most deadly weapons left behind by war. A 1993 U.S. State Department report calls them "the most toxic and widespread pollution facing mankind." They damage the environment in four principal ways: 1) by denying access to natural resources and arable land; 2) by forcing populations to move into marginal and fragile environments; 3) by (as a result of this migration) speeding depletion of biological diversity; and 4) by causing explosions that disrupt essential soil and water processes.

--In Vietnam from 1965 to 1971, the U.S. developed new ways to destroy plant, animal, and human life. It sprayed 14-percent of South Vietnam's forests with herbicides, burned farm land, and shot livestock. The herbicide Agent Orange caused some half-million birth defects and still threatens the health of the Vietnamese. During the Gulf War, Iraq released 10-million gallons of oil into the Persian Gulf and set 732 oil wells on fire, causing extensive damage to wildlife and poisoning ground water with oil spills. Wars in Angola eliminated 90-percent of the wildlife between 1975 and 1991. A civil war in Sri Lanka felled five-million trees.

--The Soviet and U.S. occupations of Afghanistan destroyed or damaged thousands of villages and poisoned the country's air and water with explosives and rocket propellants. Afghanistan's forests are almost gone, and most of the migratory birds that used to pass through the country are no longer seen.

--In its 1991 aerial campaign over Iraq, the U.S. used 340 tons of missiles containing depleted uranium, leading to significantly higher rates of cancer, birth defects, and infant mortality in the city of Fallujah in early 2010.

--The U.S. Department of Defense generates more chemical waste than the five largest chemical companies combined.

--If we don't soon abolish war, we will by the year 2050 produce such a dramatically changing climate that it will disrupt the global economy and set millions of refugees on the move.

War and the Preparation for War Siphon Off Federal Funds Essential To Preserving the Environment.

From the same sources in the WBW online course, I learned that war and the preparation for war also harm the environment indirectly by draining off federal funds that might otherwise be used to help secure the environment. Here are some of the ways that happens:

--Although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency spends $622 million each year trying to figure out how to produce power without oil, the U.S. military spends hundreds of billions of dollars burning oil in wars fought to control the supply of oil. The million dollars it takes to maintain each soldier in a foreign occupation for a year could create 20 green-energy jobs at $50,000 each.

--Bloated by a spendthrift consumption of oil, the out-of-control U.S. military budget greatly diminishes financial resources needed to address and combat global climate change--today's paramount environmental issue.

--In 2003, two-thirds of the U.S. army's fuel consumption could be accounted for by vehicles delivering fuel to the battlefield.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 4   Supported 3   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Anschuetz Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

In retirement, Bob Anschuetz has applied his long career experience as an industrial writer and copy editor to helping authors meet publishing standards for both online articles and full-length books. In work as a volunteer editor for OpEdNews, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Obama Is Necessarily Disappointing Us, and What We Can Do about It.

THE CHALLENGE OF THE CONSERVATIVE MINDSET

We Need a Progressive Primary Challenge to Obama in 2012!

A VIEW FROM THE PROGRESSIVE SIDE: Ayn Rand's Despised "Altruism" Is Essential to Building a NATION of "Producers."

It's Time for a New U.S. Foreign Policy Committed to Diplomacy and Peace

Progressives Need To Stand for Something Positive and New: the Broad Common Interest, Not Narrow Special Interests.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend