As Deputy Governor Nishimura points out, banks' "fountain of knowledge" is the relationships they hold with their customers. Banks (by definition) hold detailed financial records about the people they deal with. Studying this, it's possible for a bank to make better judgments than an outsider about who is likely to pay back a loan and who is likely to go deadbeat.
This means banks have a leg up on everyone else in the loans business. Do they have a similar "insider view" of the stock market, where many of them have been increasingly investing over the last several years?
Maybe in specialized cases, but there's nothing inherent to the operations of most banks that would give them more information about stocks. They know just as much (or less) than investment funds, brokers and even individual investors.
The informational advantage can be especially strong in natural resources. Renewables, mining and petroleum are sectors understood by a relatively small number of professionals. Creating potential for mis-pricings of resource assets and stocks.
Teck has a huge informational advantage in analyzing zinc deposits. Built up over decades of expense in analyzing every ore body they could find on the planet. DeGolyer MacNaughton has an informational advantage in U.S. shale gas. GeothermEx (and now Schlumberger) has a big advantage in assessing geothermal prospects.
There are specialty funds that retain professionals from all of these fields in order to gain informational advantage. There are investors who travel to projects worldwide 340 days of the year to gain informational advantage. There are brokers who socialize with the industry's inner circle for most of their waking lives in order to get the informational scoop.
If you're investing, what do you know that most others don't?
By. DaveForest
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
