Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H2'ed 5/16/13

Tea Party Welfare Queens Cry IRS Foul

By       (Page 2 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page. (View How Many People Read This)   3 comments
Author 14586
Message William Boardman
Become a Fan
  (34 fans)

 

The Problem With 527 Organizations Is Some Transparency

 

527 organizations (a broad category that includes Super PACs) have been an open charade in the democratic process for years, avoiding direct support of candidates while producing material that could only support their chosen candidates. For example the 527 organization Swift Boat Veterans for Truth attacked presidential candidate John Kerry during the 2004 election, without actually expressing direct support for President Bush.  

 

In June 2010, Karl Rove and American Crossroads founded Crossroads GPS (Grassroots Policy Strategies) that, as a 501(c)(4), had even fewer constraints.  American Crossroads was one of 1,500 applicants for 501(c)(4) status in 2010. 

In 2012 there were some 3,400 applications. 

 

According to the Internal Revenue Code passed by Congress, 501(c)(4) status is reserved for "civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare" [emphasis added].   In 1959, during the Eisenhower administration, the IRS decided to ignore the letter of the law, and wrote rules for 501(c)(4) organizations requiring only that they be primarily for the promotion of social welfare. 

 

Supreme Court Puts Money-ocracy Over Democracy 

 

The difference between "exclusively" and "primarily" created a loophole even a non-lawyer could exploit, but it became most useful to $100 million outfits like American Crossroads only after the Supreme Court, with its January 2010, 5-4 decision in Citizens United (558 US 310), opened the American political process to virtually any money from any source, with almost no duty to disclose anything. 

 

Similarly, the emergence of 527 organizations derived from another Supreme Court decision, Buckley v Valeo (424 US 1) in January 1976, representing the court's pushback against federal election laws passed by Congress to address some of the recent Watergate abuses.  Issued as an anonymous decision "by the court" (with two, opposing dissents), Buckley effectively gave money the same legal standing as speech, complete with First Amendment protection, albeit with some restrictions. 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

Rate It | View Ratings

William Boardman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: