The SI article concludes by sampling some of the diversity of ideas, sometimes contradictory, within the 9/11 Truth movement. These contradictions are supposed to discredit the movement as a whole. But the point is that there has been no credible inquiry into 9/11, and until the facts are uncovered, it is entirely appropriate that a multiplicity of diverse hypotheses should be put forth and discussed. SI has been on the side of open inquiry so often in the past; why, in this case should the group go on record seeking to shut off debate?
I would not denounce the SI article because it contains errors; rather, it belongs in the public domain as part of a vibrant and open scientific debate - - the best way to determine the truth about 9/11.
The proper subject of this Tenth Anniversary retrospective ought to be a call for open and independent investigation, so that the diverse tools and brains of science can be recruited for illumination of the defining political event of the last decade.
Josh Mitteldorf holds a doctorate in physics, and is a founding member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
4
4
2
