Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/23/13

Second Amendment not absolute

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   8 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 7117
Message P. A. Triot

Those black powder rifles also did double duty as hunting rifles and for self defense against marauding interlopers that frequently roamed the rural countryside of the American frontier.

Having grown up in the high country of Colorado, I had an excellent understanding of men and women who hunted wild game to feed their families. I'd say most homes had at least one firearm.

I am a strong believer in the Second Amendment. However, I do not believe it is absolute any more than  are the rights guaranteed in the First Amendment, which deal with freedom of expression. There has to be limitations for the right to own and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

Without such limitations, civilized society is guaranteed to devolve into nightmarish chaos.

I do not believe that any person has the right to bear arms if their background shows a criminal history or has a mental illness. It doesn't bother me if such background checks take as long as six months to a year to complete. Those who own weapons should be subject to severe penalties in the event any of their weapons fall into violent hands owing to negligence.

I don't believe citizens have a right to own or use automatic firearms (they used to be called machine-guns). I don't believe citizens should have armor-piercing ammunition.

In short I don't believe any citizen should be allowed to possess weapons that outgun police officers.

I don't believe individuals should be allowed to possess rocket launchers, tanks, artillery pieces or nuclear weapons. Nor should members of the public have access to aircraft equipped with air-to-ground weapons.

Somewhere is a line of demarcation between the Second Amendment being absolute or having limits. I think my line is more logical and better suited for today's society.

- Copyright 2013 by P. A. Triot. Copy and distribute at will, with proper attribution. P. A. Triot is a pen name of a retired journalist.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 1   Funny 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

P. A. Triot Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

P. A. Triot is the pen name of a retired journalist.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Palin a liability; McCain's judgment fails

Neocon ideas, free-trade theory discredited

Examining Palin's qualifications, judgment not sexist

McCain's health an issue; answers demanded

Presidential campaign: issues or character

Norquist pledges likely to trigger GOP death knell

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: