The result is an imperfect situation for a new President. However, it is not an impossible situation. Yet imperfect as it is, it provides an opportunity to adopt and accord structure and activity which provides definition upon the national government with stability and peace.
The President-elect's proposed removal of the troops, phased in a responsible manner is but one of the essential steps to avoid repetition of Ceasefire I and Ceasefire II during the Vietnam era. Withdrawal, even directed by our surest military leaders and done in consultation with the Iraqi government, provides little if any of the basis for international accord or the institutional social , economic and political health of the nation. Nor does pure withdrawal address the most fundamental character of democratic governments: that they transcend themselves and turn over the powers of the nation to a new government that will support the next transcendence of government.
For that to be, the next President need stem the tide of regional isolations and animosity. That can best be addressed with the realism of the threats the American nation. There is a definite danger of a collapse or threat upon the national government which can further erode the perception of response by the American government to properly intervene and maintain an order in the conflicts and humanitarian needs of the world.
The definition of an enhanced schedule of withdrawal must be accompanied by tandem schedules that provide verification to the American principles of democracy. Elections for a new national government are central. They can be done without the "imperfections" of 2005 and within the timetable (that American and Iraqi forces can provide apt security) of withdrawal. Operationally, the conduct of elections adds a new dimension to the commanders withdrawal timetable, but measures a definition of stability for which forces may be minimized.
Additionally, diplomatic measures must be administered. One clear and transparent measure is the holding of regional conferences, open to diplomats to the national governments of the region and qualified non- governmental organizations. Regional conferences, the establishment of organizations for the hearing of grievances, developing a functional organization with such efforts as economic development and assistance are beyond the battlefield duties of commanders with directives to maintain counter-insurgency and the strict protection.
The character of best amongst best can do the simultaneous. Leadership can address with principles that upon real and present threats to the American nation, engage in diplomacy (even extended to even unfriendly governments as they may offer response to a friendly but firm approach), implement accords directly with the national government regarding conciliatory factors, national assets, and advance a specific course of postal, commerce, and maritime agreements and treaties of peace and friendship.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
2
2
2
