311 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 63 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 7/1/08

My Experiment With Rep. Robert Wexler on Fixing One Media Flaw That Angers A Lot of Viewers/Listeners

By       (Page 2 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   7 comments
Author 1
Editor-in-Chief

Rob Kall
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall
Become a Fan
  (292 fans)

Before I knew it, we'd been talking about the bill and Israel and Iran for 13 minutes. There were only ten minutes left and the big subject I'd wanted to discuss with Wexler was impeachment. I had afterdowningstreet co-founder impeachment activist David Swanson waiting to get into the conversation and I wanted to ask Wexler how I could persuade my congressman, and my listeners could persuade theirs to endorse Kucinich's two impeachment resolutions and get things moving off the table.

But in the back of my mind, I had a question that would be rather confrontive. "The wording about a blockade may not be in there, but how can you assume it won't be used. Isn't that the kind of thinking that led so many democrats to support the original resolution that Bush used to go to war?" It wasn't the only question. There were a lot of them I could have asked.

But I didn't ask it. I didn't have much time left. David was waiting on the phone. I had more questions I wanted to ask and so I moved on.

After the interview, I called Cheryl. She was frustrated too.

I asked her why she didn't ask the question. She explained she didn't want to interrupt and saw I was moving on. I pointed out that she could have asked. But, almost as I said it, I felt guilty. I was the host and she was a caller, well sort of. (I am experimenting with the idea of having invited, temporary co-hosts who are writers with expertise in the area to raise the level of discussion and smarten up my expertise. It's clear that it's an idea that needs fine-tuning, with some instructions to the temporary co-hosts on persisting with their questions.)

I woke up thinking there was another option—an alternative to us both being frustrated. And when I checked my Blackberry, I found an email expressing frustration that Cheryl had written me at 3:02 AM.

I'm a multimedia kind of guy. The radio show I do is an extension and outgrowth of the writing I do-- for OpEdNews.com and the Huffingtonpost. The way I see it, the conversation with congressman Wexler doesn't have to be over.

I believe that he went into the interview with good faith, as did I.

But now I can see just how tough it is, for an MSM journalist to drill down and follow up on answers by interview subjects who don't nail the issue on their first answer. I had half an hour. Most people on MSNBC, CNN, etc. have a few minutes and a producer whispering in their ear moving them along. They have a tight schedule and no room to ask that extra question, which the interviewee may or may not answer directly and straightforwardly, which either way could add two, three or more minutes to a time slot that doesn’t allow for that extra time.

So what's a frustrated interviewer to do when there's not enough time, when other questions are pressing and the REAL question hasn't been asked, the REAL answer hasn't been reached? I mean, I've been furious with interviewers for doing what I did. And here, I was DOING it.

Now part of my thinking was that this was a really confrontive question and I wanted to maintain a relationship with Wexler, to be able to interview him on the radio show or for articles again. You don't get TOO in a persons face and stay cordial. But there was also the consideration whether I'd get a real answer or a less than direct answer-- anywhere from a total evasion to a long-winded answer that would eat up a lot more minutes without dealing with the real issue. Politicians are masters at that.

I have to stop for a moment and allow myself to be distracted. Richard Belzer's dog (I just met Belzer AND his dog at the Personal Democracy forum on Tuesday) just threw up on Mika, on the Morning Joe Show. They're standing around talking about vomit. reaching millions. And look at me, flagellating myself over not asking a question.

Okay. I'm done laughing at the puke commentary. Now we know Mika's dog throws up all the time. Thanks for that Mika. Okay, so now I'm really, done talking about dog vomit... I think. We can get back to talking about media vomit—you know, when interviewees give weak or disingenuous or evasive answers and the hosts just give them a pass.

I was talking about not having gotten the questions answered, my own personal experience with media vomit, about waking up before dawn, being upset about it, and finally, about an idea I had for a solution.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media.

Check out his platform at RobKall.com

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio:

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend