Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 42 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 5/15/19

Health Canada NOW says: "Avoid Sugar Substitutes!" but U.S. Won't Do So Because of Corporate Manipulation of FDA

By       (Page 2 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 4578
Message Stephen Fox
Become a Fan
  (34 fans)
- Advertisement -

Carbonated drinks are the top source of artificial sweeteners in the American diet.

What does the research say?

Research shows that stevia and monk fruit, the natural sugar substitutes, are safe for human consumption. There has been conflicting research about the safety of artificial sweeteners, depending on whether it is the corporations making aspartame who are paying for the research, or research independently funded.

Some studies have suggested that artificial sweeteners could increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease and cancer, and may have a negative influence on the microbiome and mental health.

- Advertisement -

("Microbiome" refers to the microorganisms in a particular environment (including the body or a part of the body). We depend on a vast army of microbes to stay alive: a microbiome that protects us against germs, breaks down food to release energy, and produces vitamins. It is the the combined genetic material of the microorganisms in a particular environment. Understanding the microbiome--human, animal, and environmental--is as important as the human genome.)

Research based on data from 37,716 men from the Health Professional's follow-up study and 80,647 women from the Nurses' Health study published in Circulation revealed that artificially sweetened beverages clearly result in a greater risk of death as well as death from heart disease. The risk was clearly indicated for women consuming 4 servings of artificially sweetened beverages a day. Politely, so as not to offend any corporate sponsors out there, this author states that his findings "need to be confirmed by further research."

Brissette: A review by the nonprofit research foundation Cochrane, conducted for the World Health Organization, examined 56 studies into the effects of sugar substitutes on health. It found that there is no evidence sugar substitutes provide any benefit and many have some risks.

An analysis of U.S. dietary intake from 2003 to 2004 shows that people tend to add artificial sweeteners to their diets rather than replacing sugary foods and beverages with them. The same seems to be true for children. This month, research published in the Pediatric Obesity journal revealed that in U.S. children, drinking artificially sweetened beverages is associated with consuming more calories and sugar.

- Advertisement -

Why the difference in advice?

U.S. and Canadian health officials are looking at the same research and have populations with similar health issues. So why the difference in guidelines regarding sugar substitutes?

The new Canadian approach seems to be that if a food or beverage doesn't have a demonstrated health benefit, it doesn't belong in your diet. Their 2019 guidelines suggest that people's taste buds will adapt to less-sweet tastes when they reduce their consumption of sweetened foods and beverages and using high-intensity sweeteners delays that process.

This is a marked change from Canada's last dietary guidelines, released in 2007, which advised the general population to consume sugar substitutes in moderation and to cut back on them if they noticed any digestive symptoms such as gas and bloating.

The new Canadian recommendations might seem tougher, but in fact, are clearer. Further, this latest Canadian Food Guide maintains that whole grains are the only grains to put on your plate, while the U.S. guideline is that at least half of your grains be whole grains. The U.S. view seems to be focused on encouraging health behaviors that are thought to be more achievable. Perhaps that is so with a populace.

- Advertisement -

Brissette interviewed Alice H. Lichtenstein, professor of nutrition science and policy at Tufts University, who was skeptical of an all-or-nothing approach to sugar substitutes. She also put forth her views in an editorial in Circulation, responding to the study that said consuming artificially sweetened beverages is associated with a greater risk of death.

"To a certain extent, as a community, we can take the high road about beverage recommendations: Drink water (or flavored water) in place of [sugar-sweetened beverages]. However, continuing this simple approach would be disingenuous because we know that it has not worked well in the past and there is little reason to expect that it will work well in the future." Lichtenstein said: "For some people, I suspect the use of high-intensity sweeteners is helpful in avoiding excess energy intake. For others, it might not be helpful."

From my point of view as an all-out ban-aspartame activist, such professorial pronouncements take on the feel of weak academic double-speak and gobbledegook, but we have learned that the preacher must avoid dumping on the choir.

A 2018 advisory from the American Heart Association also takes a more mousy approach to sugar substitutes than Canada's, stating that they can play a role in helping people to reduce the amount of sugar-sweetened beverages they're drinking. Their advisory also says beverages containing low-calorie sweeteners could be especially useful for people who are used to sweetness and find water unappealing at first.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Fox Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Early in the 2016 Primary campaign, I started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the most (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NYC Council "STANDS UNITED" WITH N.DAKOTA PROTESTERS, 2 new videos of police using pepper spray and rubber bullets

Mirena Interuterine Devices can cause Depression, Mood swings, Acne, Back Pain, Uterine Cysts, and Uterine Perforations

Bernie Meets with LA Times Editorial Board (this is the complete transcript!)

What does Coca Cola's Dasani bottled water have in common with Death by Lethal Injection?

CA Exit Polls reveal 23% Discrepancy; 11 States With Vote "Flipping" Evidence; Our New Directions in American History?

In the California Primary, More Ballots Remain Uncounted than the Total Number of votes for Hillary Clinton!

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.

Comment Here:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments  Post Comment

Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578

(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 33 fans, 418 articles, 396 quicklinks, 3104 comments, 14 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content
Sometimes hard ball consumer protection efforts bring good results, particularly in other nations with a healthy skepticism of the US, like Canada in this case, like Pakistan when it banned Monosodium Glutamate less than a year ago, and with all of the nations which have banned Roundup/Glyphosate, the latest of which is Vietnam.

However, industry is savvy; one nations bans it and they promote it in others, in this case, Bangladesh, one of the poorest nations in the world. Check out this video puff piece/news item about their poison "gaining popularity. The lawsuits on Roundup/Glyphosate will have a deadly effect world wide on Bayer/Monsanto, let me assure you....

Ajinomoto seasoning gains popularity in Bangladesh - ANI News Dhaka (Bangladesh) Jan 4 (ANI): The Ajinomoto Group produces and sells various seasonings and processed foods in more than 130 countries and regions ...
(Image by YouTube, Channel: ANI News)
Details DMCA

Submitted on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 2:30:30 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

molly cruz

Become a Fan
Author 7804

(Member since Sep 16, 2007), 14 fans, 17 articles, 579 quicklinks, 2731 comments, 14 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

My reaction to Aspartame was huge, and I didn't know it was in the product I used.packaged Kraft instant ice tea.When I wrote Kraft, they referred me to Monsanto, and Monsanto referred me to FDA approvals of tests I later learned they did themselves. Sugar was the first item on the 'contents' list, so I looked no further for artificial sweeteners, the last item on the list. Now I wonder, is that what's producing all these autistic kids? Pregnant women don't like the weight gain associated with the condition, so my first guess years ago was the lack of sufficient cholesterol to produce healthy brains in the fetus. But I do recall the first packet of sweetener I ever read, and it cautioned those who did not absolutely need it from using it. Saccharine. I hated the taste, and like birth control pills, also suspect I thought, of getting a little too close to meddling with a basic bodily process, I decided to pass. When a friend of mine stopped taking them to have a second child, she went into menopause at 28 years. I believe this and other large scale medical mistakes is behind the suspicion that vaccines may also be quite harmful in subtle ways that will take their inventors by surprise.

Submitted on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 12:21:20 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Dr. Betty Martini

Become a Fan
Author 8816

(Member since Nov 25, 2007), 25 articles, 134 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

Yes, you are right. The FDA sealed the teratology studies that were part of the Bressler Report. Go to The last chapter of "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills by Dr. Woodrow Monte, is on aspartame and autism: The FDA didn't even have the decency to add a pregnancy warning when studies showed spina bifida and neural tube defects, cleft palate, etc. Read the Aspartame Resource Guide on and it will give you a lot of the information you need. All my best, Betty

Submitted on Friday, May 17, 2019 at 11:22:44 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment