Figure: Protest sign in support of Roman Zadorov. It is the most notorious case a mong the cases, which are presented in the complaint as examples of fraud by judges in Net-HaMishpat -- case management system of the Israel courts.
____
Conduct of fake/simulated murder trial on Roman Zadorov
Among the cases, which are provided in the complaint as examples of fraud in Net-HaMishpat records, the most notorious is the fraud by Judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman, and Haim Galpaz in fabricating the murder "Verdict" and "Sentencing" records in Roman Zadorov's trial in 2010 in the Nazareth District Court.
Regarding Roman Zadorov's conviction, a senior criminal law professor wrote: "Conviction with no real evidence". Another senior professor wrote: "Conduct of the prosecution in the Zadorov file is scary" and when you add to it the position of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General in recent years, we are left with a justice system, which is primarily defending itself." [4]
Figures: The Shin-Bet Act (2002 ) charges the Shin-Bet, today headed by Nadav Argaman with the safeguard of procedures and institutions of the democratic regime against threats of terror, sabotage and subversion...
____
Previous inquiries with the Shin-Bet Head pertained to fraud in IT systems of the Central Election Committee and in the Committee's response on a Freedom of Information Act request regarding lawful validation and certification of its IT systems. The Committee falsely stated in its response that the Shin-Bet validated and certified its systems. The Shin-Bet, on the other hand, did not hesitate to expose the falsehood of such response by the Committee. [5]
It should be noted that also in the Central Election Committee, the top figures are senior judges and attorneys"
Lack of integrity of Israeli court records was noted by the UN Human Rights Council
Already the 2013 UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report included a note regarding: "Lack of integrity in electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Detainees' Courts in Israel". The statement was based on the Human Rights Alert -NGO submission. Such submission was primarily based at the time on system analysis and data mining. The findings raise doubt that Israeli courts can be considered competent Courts of Record any longer.
The novelty in the complaint, filed today, was the documentation of a series of case studies, fully supporting the same conclusions, and further provide details of the manner in which such systems are employed to pervert justice.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
