323 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 34 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 3/3/11

Climate Gambit: How Rightwing Hypocrisy Endangers Us

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments

James Thindwa

Addressing a West Virginia Labor Day rally to gin up opposition to such legislative action, Sean Hannity charged that Barack Obama "hates the coal industry" and wants to destroy jobs. This is the same Hannity who championed the Iraq War supposedly out of concern for national security. For Hannity and his fellow travelers, invading Iraq, even under specious pretexts, was a national security imperative; but the prospect of catastrophic climate change, which is actually supported by evidence, is not.  

Another mystifying aspect to the willingness of conservative to take a risk on climate change is their disinterest in predictions of massive human dislocation if mitigating action is not taken. A 2005 report by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change paints a sobering picture of millions of "climate refugees" created by ever-violent weather. In 2050, the report says, there will be 150 million climate refugees.  

One would think a conservative movement in convulsions over "illegal" immigration might be concerned about this particular dimension of the climate change problem. In Mexico, this year's winter storm brought snow to Chihuahua, where temperatures plunged to 9 degrees Fahrenheit--the coldest since 1951--and a state of emergency was declared.  

It is noteworthy and ironic that on two of their obsessions--war-making and climate change--conservatives take positions that aggravate yet another movement touchstone: illegal immigration. The right is oblivious to the paradox of crusading against immigration while ignoring how wars trigger human migrations. The Iraq War, for example, has dislocated over 5 million people, and the numbers continue to rise. Perhaps instead of scapegoating immigrants, conservatives might rethink their ideological precepts around war and climate change.    

Finally, setting aside the issue of evidence, why isn't the elimination of dangerous pollutants from our atmosphere not a good idea anyway? Why, we might ask, would a party that lays such claim to patriotism pursue a suicidal agenda for the country?   And what if--to paraphrase Hannity himself--they are wrong, and global warming kills a lot of people and imperils the planet?

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

James Thindwa Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James Thindwa is a Chicago resident and long time labor and community activist. He serves on the board of directors of, and writes for, In These Times magazine. Thindwa's work was featured on the Bill Moyers Journal on March 27, 2009.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Climate Gambit: How Rightwing Hypocrisy Endangers Us

Locked Up to Disenfranchize

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend